NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)11
Since 2006 (last 20 years)17
Source
Discourse Processes: A…17
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 17 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Heritage, John; Raymond, Chase Wesley – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2016
We consider here Goffman's proposal of proportionality between virtual offenses and remedial actions, based on the examination of 102 cases of explicit apologies. To this end, we offer a typology of the primary apology formats within the dataset, together with a broad categorization of the types of virtual offenses to which these apologies are…
Descriptors: Interpersonal Communication, Responses, Interaction, Speech Acts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pino, Marco; Pozzuoli, Loredana; Riccioni, Ilaria; Castellarin, Valentine – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2016
In this article we examine a turn construction ("oh"+apology+solution) that speakers use to deal with the concomitant presence of a possible offense and a problem-to-be-solved in the immediately preceding interactional environment. We show that speakers collaborate in differentiating the offense aspect and the problem aspect of an…
Descriptors: Interpersonal Communication, Responses, Interaction, Speech Acts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fatigante, Marilena; Biassoni, Federica; Marazzini, Francesca; Diadori, Pierangela – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2016
People identify apologies as unique types of actions as compared with kin-related moves, which remedy troubles or offenses, such as excuses and justifications (Goffman, 1971; Owen, 1983; Olshtain & Cohen, 1983; Sbisa, 1999). A feature of these apologies is the speaker's acknowledgment of personal responsibility for having caused trouble or…
Descriptors: Interpersonal Communication, Responses, Interaction, Speech Acts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Margutti, Piera; Traverso, Véronique; Pugliese, Rosa – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2016
We investigate an apology format, "I'm sorry about it/that," where indexical terms (pronouns) refer to the offense rather than naming it. We identified two subsets in our collection of indexical apologies. In one, indexicals are subsequent either to the offense formulation or to an apology-relevant event; in the second, indexicals are…
Descriptors: Interpersonal Communication, Responses, Interaction, Speech Acts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Moxey, Linda M. – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2018
Statements containing quantity information are commonplace. Although there is literature explaining the way in which quantities themselves are conveyed in numbers or words (e.g., "many", "probably"), there is less on the effects of different types of quantity description on the processing of surrounding text. Given that…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Nouns, Phrase Structure, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Çokal, Derya; Sturt, Patrick; Ferreira, Fernanda – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2018
Two experiments explored the hypothesis that anaphors and demonstratives signal different procedural instructions: Whereas the anaphor "it" brings a concrete entity into a reader's focus, the demonstrative "this" directs the focus to a predicate proposition in a discourse representation. The findings from an online eye-tracking…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Eye Movements, Form Classes (Languages), Reading Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Braun, Michael T.; Van Swol, Lyn M.; Vang, Lisa – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2015
Using the software program LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count), this study used political statements classified as truths and lies by website Politifact.com and examined lexical differences between statement type (lie or truth) and the setting (interactive or scripted) in which the statement was given. In interactive settings (where…
Descriptors: Deception, Politics, Language Usage, Form Classes (Languages)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Parvaresh, Vahid; Tayebi, Tahmineh – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2014
The present study sets out to investigate the structures and functions of vague expressions in Persian. The data under scrutiny include a 15-hour corpus of informal conversations. The corpus reveals some unique vague expressions including "rhyming words," "replacing expressions," and "the affective completer."…
Descriptors: Indo European Languages, Discourse Analysis, Models, Computational Linguistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kehler, Andrew; Rohde, Hannah – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2017
According to Question-Under-Discussion (QUD) models of discourse interpretation, clauses cohere with the preceding context by virtue of providing answers to (usually implicit) questions that are situated within a speaker's goal-driven strategy of inquiry. In this article we present four experiments that examine the predictions of a QUD model of…
Descriptors: Prediction, Questioning Techniques, Models, Expectation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yu, Guodong; Wu, Yaxin – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2015
This study, using conversation analysis as the research methodology, probes into the use of "nage" (literally "that") as a practice of managing awkward, sensitive, or delicate issues in radio phone-in medical consultations about sex-related problems. Through sequential manipulation and turn manipulation, the caller uses…
Descriptors: Radio, Discourse Analysis, Telecommunications, Medical Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tudini, Vincenza – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2015
This study explores whether chat users are able to extend prior, apparently completed posts in the dyadic online text chat context. Dyadic text chat has a unique turn-taking system, and most chat softwares do not permit users to monitor one another's written messages-in-progress. This is likely to impact on their use of online extensions as an…
Descriptors: Computer Mediated Communication, Interpersonal Communication, Interaction, Language Usage
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Giora, Rachel; Drucker, Ari; Fein, Ofer; Mendelson, Itamar – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2015
Findings from five experiments support the view that negation generates sarcastic utterance-interpretations by default. When presented in isolation, novel negative constructions ("Punctuality is not his forte," "Thoroughness is not her most distinctive feature"), free of semantic anomaly or internal incongruity, were…
Descriptors: Morphemes, Language Usage, Semantics, Structural Analysis (Linguistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li, Haiying; Graesser, Arthur C.; Conley, Mark; Cai, Zhiqiang; Pavlik, Philip I., Jr.; Pennebaker, James W. – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2016
Formality has long been of interest in the study of discourse, with periodic discussions of the best measure of formality and the relationship between formality and text categories. In this research, we explored what features predict formality as humans perceive the construct. We categorized a corpus consisting of 1,158 discourse samples published…
Descriptors: Discourse Analysis, Computational Linguistics, Comparative Analysis, Speeches
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
St. John, Oliver; Cromdal, Jakob – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2016
This study examines classroom task instructions--phases traditionally associated with noninteractional objectives and operations--and reveals their composition as interactionally complex and cocrafted. Analyses of video sequences of task instructional activity from three different secondary school lessons show that student questions routinely…
Descriptors: Video Technology, Secondary School Students, Questioning Techniques, Teacher Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boyd, Maureen; Kong, Yiren – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2017
Reasoning words are linguistic features associated with classroom exploratory talk as students talk-to-learn, explore ideas, and probe each other's thinking. This study extends established research on use of reasoning words to a fourth- to fifth-grade literature-based English language learning context. We examined frequency and patterning of…
Descriptors: Classroom Communication, Grade 4, Grade 5, Elementary School Students
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2