NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kammerer, Edward F., Jr. – Journal of Political Science Education, 2021
Moot Court, or simulated appellate argument, is a common practice in law schools across the country. At the undergraduate level, moot court is less common, but is growing. This paper offers advice to faculty considering developing a new intercollegiate moot court competition team. The advice is based on the author's own experience starting teams…
Descriptors: Law Related Education, Undergraduate Students, Intercollegiate Cooperation, Competition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stepp, Kyla K.; Castle, Jeremiah J. – Journal of Political Science Education, 2019
This short review demonstrates how the use of American Mock Trial Association (AMTA) case materials, both throughout intercollegiate competitions and in academic courses, can engage and invigorate students while teaching them crucial skills in a way that few other programs or activities can do. The AMTA case provided for the 2017-2018 academic…
Descriptors: Simulation, Court Litigation, Critical Thinking, Criminal Law
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bengtson, Teri J.; Sifferd, Katrina L. – Journal of Political Science Education, 2010
Simulations in political science and pre-law courses are used as a tool for student engagement and classroom interaction and to get students interested in politics and law by engaging them in either the political or legal process. Much of the literature addresses how to conduct various simulations for particular classes, what the students learned…
Descriptors: Law Related Education, Political Science, Interaction, Lawyers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zeigler, Sara L.; Moran, Sheena M. – Journal of Political Science Education, 2008
The manuscript explores gender stereotyping in performance evaluations in undergraduate mock trial competitions. The central hypothesis is that gendered expectations for attorney and witness behavior in the legal community inform and influence the evaluation of undergraduate performance in relation to communication methods, argumentation…
Descriptors: Judges, Law Related Education, Females, Sex Stereotypes