Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Aro, Mikko T. | 1 |
Assouline, Susan G. | 1 |
Batiste, Maurice L. | 1 |
Björn, Piia M. | 1 |
Colangelo, Nicholas | 1 |
Foley-Nicpon, Megan | 1 |
Fuchs, Douglas H. | 1 |
Fuchs, Lynn S. | 1 |
Koponen, Tuire K. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Finland | 1 |
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Education for All Handicapped… | 3 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 3 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Batiste, Maurice L. – ProQuest LLC, 2019
The very first federal law that affected a student with special needs was the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EHA: Public Law 94-142) established in 1975 by the United States Congress. PL 94-142 required all schools that received federal funds to accept students with physical and mental disabilities and to educate these children in the…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Technology Uses in Education, Students with Disabilities, Equal Education
Foley-Nicpon, Megan; Assouline, Susan G.; Colangelo, Nicholas – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2013
Twice-exceptionality is gaining increasing recognition in the gifted education literature but little is understood about the knowledge and awareness of this concept within the educational and psychological community, or about professionals' experience working with this population of learners. Three-hundred and seventeen individuals completed an…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Gifted, Special Education, Needs Assessment
Björn, Piia M.; Aro, Mikko T.; Koponen, Tuire K.; Fuchs, Lynn S.; Fuchs, Douglas H. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2016
Response to intervention (RTI) can be considered an everyday practice in many parts of the United States, whereas, in Finland, only recently has a new framework for support in learning taken shape. Choosing Finland as the comparative partner for this policy paper is justified as its educational system has been widely referenced on the basis of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Response to Intervention, Special Education, International Assessment