Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Learning Disabilities | 3 |
Program Effectiveness | 3 |
Reading Failure | 3 |
Grade 1 | 2 |
Achievement Gains | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
Dyslexia | 1 |
Early Intervention | 1 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Elementary School Students | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Briggs, Connie | 1 |
Hobsbaum, Angela | 1 |
McCarthy, Kenneth E. | 1 |
McIntyre, Laureen | 1 |
McQuarrie, Lynn | 1 |
Protz, Susan | 1 |
Schwartz, Robert M. | 1 |
Scull, Janet | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 1 | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Schwartz, Robert M.; Hobsbaum, Angela; Briggs, Connie; Scull, Janet – International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 2009
Reynolds and Wheldall reviewed research relating to Reading Recovery (RR) and concluded that "RR has provided an excellent model in demonstrating how to plan, promote, and implement an intervention across an educational system and how to design a professional development programme" (2007, p. 218). They balanced this praise with concerns about the…
Descriptors: Early Intervention, Reading Failure, Models, Professional Development
McIntyre, Laureen; Protz, Susan; McQuarrie, Lynn – Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 2008
The purpose of this study was to determine if phonemic awareness skills improved for first grade students classified as at-risk whose teachers used the Lindamood Phoneme Sequencing Program (LiPS; Lindamood & Lindamood, 1998). Students' scores on a Kindergarten screening tool (Learning Disabilities Working Committee-LDWC, 2005) were compared to…
Descriptors: Phonemics, Learning Disabilities, Reading Failure, Phonemic Awareness

McCarthy, Kenneth E. – Reading Improvement, 1995
Reports on the second year of a supplementary reading program. Notes the program was successful with nonreading or delayed-reading students from regular and special education classrooms in grades one through eight. Argues that labels such as at-risk, learning disabled, and dyslexic are excuses for not initially teaching children how to read. (SR)
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Elementary Education, High Risk Students, Junior High Schools