NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Individuals with Disabilities…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 33 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jeffrey Shero; Jessica Logan – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2024
Background/Context: Previous research in educational assessment has consistently emphasized the importance of reliability as a cornerstone of test quality. Traditional measures of reliability, such as test-retest and split-half reliability, offer a broad view of how internally consistent a measure is but overlook the variability in this internal…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Special Education, Students with Disabilities, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stirk, Steven; Field, Bryony; Black, Jessica – Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2018
Background: The Learning Disability Screening Questionnaire (LDSQ) has been shown to have high sensitivity and specificity to identify those who are likely to meet intellectual disability diagnostic criteria (McKenzie, et al. [McKenzie K., 2015]). However, there is no independent research to date to support these findings. Materials and Methods:…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Questionnaires, Screening Tests, Diagnostic Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Taha, Mohamed M.; El Nagar, Hosny Z. – Insights into Learning Disabilities, 2018
The purpose of this study is to construct and evaluate diagnostic battery tests of verbal and non-verbal learning disabilities for students in the Arabic schools. 612 students were in the 3rd, 4th and 5th grades of primary school were involved, mostly from Egypt and Saudi Arabia. Their ages ranged from 7.94-10.98 with mean age = 9.62 and SD =…
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Learning Disabilities, Foreign Countries, Grade 3
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McGill, Ryan J.; Styck, Kara M.; Palomares, Ronald S.; Hass, Michael R. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2016
As a result of the upcoming Federal reauthorization of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), practitioners and researchers have begun vigorously debating what constitutes evidence-based assessment for the identification of specific learning disability (SLD). This debate has resulted in strong support for a method that…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Disability Identification, Disabilities, Federal Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Colp, S. Mitchell; Nordstokke, David W. – Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2014
Published by the Canadian Test Centre (CTC), "Insight" represents a group-administered test of cognitive functioning that has been built entirely upon the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theoretical framework. "Insight" is intended to be administered by educators and screen entire classrooms for students who present learning…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Learning Disabilities, Intelligence Tests, Profiles
Pearson, 2018
The Wechsler Intelligence Test for Children -- Fifth Edition (WISC-V) is a comprehensive intellectual ability assessment for children. The WISC-V was developed over the course of five years by an expert team including doctoral-level scientists and clinicians and an advisory panel, who provided expert advice about intellectual ability testing,…
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Children, Cognitive Ability, Adolescents
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Greathouse, Dan; Shaughnessy, Michael F. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2016
Whenever a major intelligence or achievement test is revised, there is always renewed interest in the underlying structure of the test as well as a renewed interest in the scoring, administration, and interpretation changes. In this interview, Amy Gabel discusses the most recent revision of the "Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth…
Descriptors: Children, Intelligence Tests, Test Use, Test Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Glass, Laura A.; Ryan, Joseph J.; Charter, Richard A. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2010
In the present investigation, the authors provide internal consistency reliabilities for Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) subtest and Index discrepancy scores using the standardization sample as the data source. Reliabilities ranged from 0.55 to 0.88 for subtest discrepancy scores and 0.80 to 0.91 for Index discrepancy…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Test Reliability, Scores, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Oakman, Sue; Wilson, Barry – Psychology in the Schools, 1988
Examined records of 170 learning-disabled students to determine stability of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R) test scores. WISC-R was readministered three years later to 150 subjects. Stability coefficients were .72, .70, and .74 for Verbal, Performance, and Full Scale Intelligence Quotient scores. Results suggest WISC-R…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities, Special Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Slate, John R.; And Others – Learning Disability Quarterly, 1991
Investigation of the stability of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Revised scores of 25 college students over a 4-year period found that global and subtest scores were highly stable. Subtest scores tended to be higher on the retest, but global scores were not despite four years of educational experiences between test administrations. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zimmerman, Irla Lee; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1986
Assessed the degree of comparability between the tests over time for two samples of referred adolescents of borderline intelligence. Results indicated that the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised significantly overestimated the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised by three to five points. Differences were most marked at the lower…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Comparative Analysis, Intelligence Tests, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rethazi, Maya; Wilson, Anne Keeton – Psychology in the Schools, 1988
Examined whether Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) could discriminate between learning disabled and normal preadolescents. Tested 43 learning disabled (LD) students and 20 students without learning disabilities. Results indicated that the Achievement score relative to the Mental Processing Composite score was the only measure to…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Evaluation, Foreign Countries, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Black, F. William – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1973
Descriptors: Aphasia, Children, Exceptional Child Research, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thompson, Robert J., Jr. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980
Although differences in composite Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised (WISC-R) measures were exhibited by children with mental retardation, learning disabilities, and psychological or behavioral disorders, few significant group differences were exhibited. Caution is necessary in making diagnostic statements based on WISC-R profile…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Children, Diagnostic Tests, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schuerholz, Linda J.; And Others – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1995
Students (n=210) in learning disabilities research centers were administered the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised and the Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised. A model considering the reliability of each measure identified learning disabilities three times more often than a regression analysis model. The regression…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Disability Identification, Elementary Education, Intelligence Tests
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3