Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Associative Learning | 2 |
| Learning Processes | 2 |
| Stimuli | 2 |
| Adjustment (to Environment) | 1 |
| Classical Conditioning | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Experiential Learning | 1 |
| Human Body | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Influences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Shanks, David R. | 2 |
| Lachnit, Harold | 1 |
| Melchers, Klaus G. | 1 |
| Speekenbrink, Maarten | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSpeekenbrink, Maarten; Shanks, David R. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2010
Multiple cue probability learning studies have typically focused on stationary environments. We present 3 experiments investigating learning in changing environments. A fine-grained analysis of the learning dynamics shows that participants were responsive to both abrupt and gradual changes in cue-outcome relations. We found no evidence that…
Descriptors: Prediction, Stimuli, Rewards, Associative Learning
Melchers, Klaus G.; Lachnit, Harold; Shanks, David R. – Learning and Motivation, 2004
In two human skin conductance conditioning experiments we investigated whether processing of stimulus compounds can be influenced by past experience. Participants were either pre-trained with a discrimination problem that could be solved elementally (A+, B-, AB+, C- in Experiment 1 and A+, AB+, C-, CB- in Experiment 2) or one that required a…
Descriptors: Experiential Learning, Stimulation, Classical Conditioning, Learning Processes
