Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Learning Processes | 2 |
| Logical Thinking | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Chemistry | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Dialogs (Language) | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| Eye Movements | 1 |
| Interaction | 1 |
| Intuition | 1 |
| Laboratory Experiments | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Cognition and Instruction | 2 |
Author
| Craig, Scotty D. | 1 |
| Gholson, Barry | 1 |
| Martina A. Rau | 1 |
| Sally P. W. Wu | 1 |
| Sullins, Jeremiah | 1 |
| Witherspoon, Amy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMartina A. Rau; Sally P. W. Wu – Cognition and Instruction, 2018
Connection-making among multiple representations is a crucial but difficult competence in STEM learning. Prior research has focused on one type of learning process involved in connection-making: sense-making processes leading to conceptual understanding of connections. Yet, other research suggests that a second type of learning process is…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Teaching Methods, Visual Perception, Control Groups
Craig, Scotty D.; Sullins, Jeremiah; Witherspoon, Amy; Gholson, Barry – Cognition and Instruction, 2006
We investigated the impact of dialogue and deep-level-reasoning questions on vicarious learning in 2 studies with undergraduates. In Experiment 1, participants learned material by interacting with AutoTutor or by viewing 1 of 4 vicarious learning conditions: a noninteractive recorded version of the AutoTutor dialogues, a dialogue with a…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Logical Thinking, Dialogs (Language), Learning Processes
