NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barth, Marius; Stahl, Christoph; Haider, Hilde – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
In implicit sequence learning, a process-dissociation (PD) approach has been proposed to dissociate implicit and explicit learning processes. Applied to the popular generation task, participants perform two different task versions: "inclusion" instructions require generating the transitions that form the learned sequence;…
Descriptors: Incidental Learning, Reaction Time, Association (Psychology), Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Runger, Dennis; Frensch, Peter A. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2008
Research on incidental sequence learning typically is concerned with the characteristics of implicit or nonconscious learning. In this article, the authors aim to elucidate the cognitive mechanisms that contribute to the generation of explicit, reportable sequence knowledge. According to the unexpected-event hypothesis (P. A. Frensch, H. Haider,…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Incidental Learning, Sequential Learning, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Goschke, Thomas; Bolte, Annette – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2007
Through the use of a new serial naming task, the authors investigated implicit learning of repeating sequences of abstract semantic categories. Participants named objects (e.g., table, shirt) appearing in random order. Unbeknownst to them, the semantic categories of the objects (e.g., furniture, clothing) followed a repeating sequence.…
Descriptors: Semantics, Learning Processes, Language Processing, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Karatekin, Canan; Marcus, David J.; White, Tonya – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2007
The goal of this study was to examine incidental and intentional spatial sequence learning during middle childhood and adolescence. We tested four age groups (8-10 years, 11-13 years, 14-17 years, and young adults [18+ years]) on a serial reaction time task and used manual and oculomotor measures to examine incidental sequence learning.…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Intentional Learning, Incidental Learning, Children