NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Breining, Bonnie L.; Nozari, Nazbanou; Rapp, Brenda – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
Using word learning as an example of a complex system, we investigated how differences in the structure of the subcomponents in which learning occurs can have significant consequences for the challenge of integrating new information within such systems. Learning a new word involves integrating information into the two key stages/subcomponents of…
Descriptors: Vocabulary, Learning Processes, Systems Approach, Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Spinelli, Giacomo; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
In the Stroop task, congruency effects (i.e., the color-naming latency difference between incongruent stimuli, e.g., the word BLUE written in the color red, and congruent stimuli, e.g., RED in red) are smaller in a list in which incongruent trials are frequent than in a list in which incongruent trials are infrequent. The traditional explanation…
Descriptors: Color, Interference (Learning), Visual Stimuli, Reaction Time
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Collina, Simona; Tabossi, Patrizia; De Simone, Flavia – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2013
Psycholinguistic experiments conducted with the picture-word interference paradigm are typically preceded by a phase during which participants learn the words they will have to produce in the experiment. In Experiment 1, the pictures (e.g., a frog) were to be named and were presented with a categorically related (e.g., "cat") or…
Descriptors: Psycholinguistics, Pictorial Stimuli, Semantics, Naming