Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Animals | 2 |
| Experiments | 2 |
| Intervals | 2 |
| Learning Processes | 2 |
| Predictor Variables | 2 |
| Reaction Time | 2 |
| Responses | 2 |
| Animal Behavior | 1 |
| Associative Learning | 1 |
| Behavior Modification | 1 |
| Conditioning | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Chubala, Chrissy M. | 1 |
| Grimes, Julie A. | 1 |
| Johns, Kenneth W. | 1 |
| Mather, Amber A. | 1 |
| Shull, Richard L. | 1 |
| Williams, Douglas A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWilliams, Douglas A.; Chubala, Chrissy M.; Mather, Amber A.; Johns, Kenneth W. – Learning and Motivation, 2009
Appetitive contextual excitation supported by intertrial unconditioned stimuli was more easily overcome by timed conditioned responding in rats using quiet (Experiment 1) rather than noisy (Experiment 2) food pellet deliveries. Head-entry responding in acquisition peaked above the contextual baseline when pellet delivery occurred 10, 30, 60, or 90…
Descriptors: Cues, Intervals, Reaction Time, Food
Shull, Richard L.; Grimes, Julie A. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2006
Rats obtained food-pellet reinforcers by nose poking a lighted key. Experiment 1 examined resistance to extinction following single-schedule training with different variable-interval schedules, ranging from a mean interval of 16 min to 0.25 min. That is, for each schedule, the rats received 20 consecutive daily baseline sessions and then a session…
Descriptors: Training, Positive Reinforcement, Intervals, Animals
