NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Peabody Picture Vocabulary…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 41 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kubik, Veit; Koslowski, Kenneth; Schubert, Torsten; Aslan, Alp – Metacognition and Learning, 2022
Interim tests of previously studied information can potentiate subsequent learning of new information, in part, because retrieval-based processes help to reduce proactive interference from previously learned information. We hypothesized that an effect similar to this forward testing effect would also occur when making judgments of (prior) learning…
Descriptors: Metacognition, Decision Making, Interference (Learning), Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Halamish, Vered; Undorf, Monika – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2023
Research has observed that monitoring one's own learning modifies memory for some materials but not for others. Specifically, making judgments of learning (JOLs) while learning word pairs improves subsequent cued-recall memory performance for related word pairs but not for unrelated word pairs. Theories that have attempted to explain this pattern…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Memory, Task Analysis, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Middlebrooks, Catherine D.; Castel, Alan D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2018
Learners make a number of decisions when attempting to study efficiently: they must choose which information to study, for how long to study it, and whether to restudy it later. The current experiments examine whether documented impairments to self-regulated learning when studying information sequentially, as opposed to simultaneously, extend to…
Descriptors: Independent Study, Memory, Sequential Learning, Study Habits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cohen, Michael S.; Rissman, Jesse; Hovhannisyan, Mariam; Castel, Alan D.; Knowlton, Barbara J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2017
People tend to show better memory for information that is deemed valuable or important. By one mechanism, individuals selectively engage deeper, semantic encoding strategies for high value items (Cohen, Rissman, Suthana, Castel, & Knowlton, 2014). By another mechanism, information paired with value or reward is automatically strengthened in…
Descriptors: Recall (Psychology), Memory, Testing, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murayama, Kou; Blake, Adam B.; Kerr, Tyson; Castel, Alan D. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
People are often exposed to more information than they can actually remember. Despite this frequent form of information overload, little is known about how much information people choose to remember. Using a novel "stop" paradigm, the current research examined whether and how people choose to stop receiving new--possibly…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Metacognition, Study Habits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pastotter, Bernhard; Schicker, Sabine; Niedernhuber, Julia; Bauml, Karl-Heinz T. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
In multiple-list learning, retrieval during learning has been suggested to improve recall of the single lists by enhancing list discrimination and, at test, reducing interference. Using electrophysiological, oscillatory measures of brain activity, we examined to what extent retrieval during learning facilitates list encoding. Subjects studied 5…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Semantics, Short Term Memory, Recall (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jalbert, Annie; Neath, Ian; Bireta, Tamra J.; Surprenant, Aimee M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
The word length effect, the finding that lists of short words are better recalled than lists of long words, has been termed one of the benchmark findings that any theory of immediate memory must account for. Indeed, the effect led directly to the development of working memory and the phonological loop, and it is viewed as the best remaining…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Language Processing, Learning Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Basden, David R.; Draper, James S. – Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1973
This study presents a systematic investigation of three factors which seem necessary to initial success in obtaining recall facilitation when list member cues are presented during free recall. (Author/KM)
Descriptors: Cues, Learning Processes, Memory, Psychological Studies
Howe, Theresa S. – J Exp Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Learning Processes, Memory, Task Performance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Young, Daniel R.; Bellezza, Francis S. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1982
Four experiments are described that demonstrate that under certain conditions, encoding constancy results in better recall performance than encoding variability. The experiments used mnemonic devices, and various numbers of semantic contexts and orienting tasks. Encoding variability resulted in optimal recall performance when only one code for an…
Descriptors: Cues, Higher Education, Learning Processes, Memory
Macht, Michael; Scheirer, C. James – Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975
A variant of the Peterson (1959) paradigm was used to investigate retrieval of single pairs of items varying in imagery value. Latency to respond showed that if one item was concrete, no differential retrieval speeds were found. This result supports an organizational view of imagery. (CHK)
Descriptors: Cues, Imagery, Learning Processes, Memory
Tzeng, Ovid J. L. – 1974
Sixty subjects learned four different 16-word lists in four different conditions. Within each list, every word was repeated. The four conditions were defined by a 2 (whole vs. blocked presentation) by 2 (same order vs. random order repetition) factorial design. An unexpected final free recall followed the immediate free recall of the fourth list.…
Descriptors: High School Students, Learning Processes, Learning Theories, Memory
Elmes, David G.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
Descriptors: Learning Processes, Memory, Paired Associate Learning, Responses
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bower, Gordon H.; Clark-Meyers, Gail – British Journal of Psychology, 1980
This study examined recall and recognition memory for two types of lists: (1) random words; and (2) words related to a "script" about a daily activity, such as eating lunch. Results indicated that the organization of words to be learned determines emergent memory structures which affect recall and recognition performances. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Adults, College Students, Learning Processes, Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bauer, Richard H. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1979
Descriptors: Children, Classification, Comparative Analysis, Learning Disabilities
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3