Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
Instructional Science: An… | 3 |
Author
Anmarkrud, Øistein | 1 |
Bråten, Ivar | 1 |
De Smul, Mona | 1 |
Devos, Geert | 1 |
Glogger-Frey, Inga | 1 |
Heirweg, Sofie | 1 |
McCrudden, Matthew T. | 1 |
Merchie, Emmelien | 1 |
Renkl, Alexander | 1 |
Strømsø, Helge I. | 1 |
Treier, Anne-Katrin | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Glogger-Frey, Inga; Treier, Anne-Katrin; Renkl, Alexander – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2022
A worked-out or an open inventing problem with contrasting cases can prepare learners for learning from subsequent instruction differently regarding motivation and cognition. In addition, such activities potentially initiate different learning processes during the subsequent ("future") learning phase. In this experiment (N = 45…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Motivation, Learning Processes, Learning Strategies
Heirweg, Sofie; De Smul, Mona; Merchie, Emmelien; Devos, Geert; Van Keer, Hilde – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2020
The present study investigates primary school students' self-regulated learning (SRL) process by exploring the sequence in which SRL activities are conducted during learning. The aims of this study are twofold: investigating the presence of the theoretically hypothesized cyclical nature in students' SRL process, as well as potential differences…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Self Management, Learning Processes, Sequential Approach
Anmarkrud, Øistein; McCrudden, Matthew T.; Bråten, Ivar; Strømsø, Helge I. – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2013
We explored readers' judgments of text relevance and strategy use while they read about a controversial scientific issue in multiple conflicting documents using a think-aloud methodology and had them write a short essay after reading. Participants were university-level students. There were three main findings. First, readers discriminated…
Descriptors: College Students, Protocol Analysis, Scientific and Technical Information, Science Materials