Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Evaluation Criteria | 2 |
| Learning Strategies | 2 |
| Protocol Analysis | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Calculus | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Instruction | 1 |
| Educational Needs | 1 |
| Evaluative Thinking | 1 |
| Expert Systems | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkPalisse, Jennifer; King, Deborah Martina; MacLean, Mark – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2022
There is a growing interest in using comparative judgement as a peer assessment tool involving students choosing the 'better' of two pieces of work. However, it has not been shown whether peer assessment through comparative judgement is effective for students' learning. To gain a better understanding of the comparative judgement process, we…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Evaluation Criteria, Peer Evaluation, Undergraduate Students
Rosenberg, Ronni – Educational Technology, 1987
Reviews the current status of intelligent tutoring systems and summarizes the literature that evaluates these systems. Discussion highlights the problems of inadequate models, the lack of protocol analysis in systems design, and flaws in testing methodologies. (20 references) (CLB)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Educational Needs, Evaluation Criteria, Expert Systems
