NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kosslyn, Stephen M.; And Others – Cognitive Psychology, 1988
Results of three experiments are reported, which indicate that images of simple two-dimensional patterns are formed sequentially. The subjects included 48 undergraduates and 16 members of the Harvard University (Cambridge, Mass.) community. A new objective methodology indicates that images of complex letters require more time to generate. (TJH)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Letters (Alphabet), Pattern Recognition, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Staller, Joshua D.; Lappin, Joseph S. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
In three experiments, this study addressed two basic questions about the detection of multiletter patterns: (1) How is the detection of a multiletter pattern related to the detection of its individual components? (2) How is the detection of a sequence of letters influenced by the observer's familiarity with that sequence? (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Higher Education, Letters (Alphabet), Pattern Recognition
Lucas, Jay P. – Creative Computing, 1980
Computer programs to protect a home computer from tampering by a preschool child, while at the same time providing practice for the child in character and shape recognition, are given. (TG)
Descriptors: Character Recognition, Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Programs, Letters (Alphabet)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Keenan, Verne – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1972
Data suggests that perceptual processing in the language-appropriate direction is an established skill by the time a child finishes second grade. (Author)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Letters (Alphabet), Pattern Recognition, Reading Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Angiolillo-Bent, Joel S.; Rips, Lance J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1982
Two strings of letters were presented. Subjects were instructed to indicate whether the second string contained the same elements as the first, regardless of position. Reaction time increased with the number of positions that the letters were displaced. Results indicate that order may be an important factor in retrieval from memory. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Adults, Cognitive Processes, Letters (Alphabet), Memory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McClelland, James L.; Rumelhart, David E. – Psychological Review, 1981
A model of context effects in perception is applied to perception of letters. Perception results from excitatory and inhibitory interactions of detectors for visual features, letters, and words. The model produces facilitation for letters in pronounceable pseudowords as well as words and accounts for rule-governed performance without any rules.…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cues, Letters (Alphabet), Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johns, Jerry L. – Journal of the Association for the Study of Perception, 1973
Article considers the motivation for perceptual recognition and cognition in evaluating the reasons for reading difficulties of children. (RK)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Graphemes, Learning Theories, Letters (Alphabet)
Northwest Regional Educational Lab., Portland, OR. – 1982
THE FOLLOWING IS THE FULL TEXT OF THIS DOCUMENT (Except for the Evaluation Summary Table): VERSION: Atari APX-20083. PRODUCER: Atari, Inc., 60 E. Plumeria, P.O. Box 50047, San Jose, California 95050. EVALUATION COMPLETED: September 1982 by the staff and constituents of the Capital Children's Museum. Their evaluation is partly based on observation…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Programs, Drills (Practice), Educational Games
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Katz, Leonard – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977
Experiments with 81 college students and 48 fifth graders investigated the role of one form of intra-word orthographic redundancy--the characteristic asymmetric spatial distributions of letters of the alphabet across serial positions within words. Adults were sensitive to letter positional distributions, as were fifth graders who were good…
Descriptors: Decoding (Reading), Higher Education, Intermediate Grades, Letters (Alphabet)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johnston, James C. – Cognitive Psychology, 1978
Experiments tested the predictions that words are perceived more accurately in strongly constraining word contexts than in weakly constraining word contexts, and that a strong perceptual advantage would be present for letters in words vs. letters alone or in unrelated-letter strings. Several alternative theories of word perception are discussed.…
Descriptors: Context Clues, Guessing (Tests), Higher Education, Learning Theories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beauchamp, Kenneth L.; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971
Descriptors: Behavioral Science Research, Discrimination Learning, Error Patterns, Information Processing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smythe, P. C.; And Others – Journal of Reading Behavior, 1971
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Beginning Reading, Developmental Reading, Elementary School Students
Koehler, John; And Others – 1971
In this study, eight groups of kindergarten children were trained to discriminate position and order differences in verbal and nonverbal item sequences in the context of a matching task or an associative learning task or both. Transfer was measured by having the subjects sight learn a list of words contrasting in position and order. Subsequently,…
Descriptors: Associative Learning, Beginning Reading, Context Clues, Decoding (Reading)
Foley, Mary Ann; Foley, Hugh J. – 1985
Two criteria for the automatic encoding of learning, instructional manipulation, and stimulus characteristics were studied in subjects who judged the frequency of occurrence of words, letters, and nonwords. In Experiment 1, six word lists were constructed with varying frequency of alphabet letters. A variety of instructions were presented (whether…
Descriptors: Advance Organizers, Cognitive Processes, Encoding (Psychology), Incidental Learning