Descriptor
Source
Library Trends | 4 |
Author
Cottam, Keith M. | 1 |
DiBona, Leslie | 1 |
Estabrook, Leigh | 1 |
Hewitt, Joe A. | 1 |
Hoffman, Irene M. | 1 |
Panitch, Judith M. | 1 |
Smith, Amy | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Hoffman, Irene M.; Smith, Amy; DiBona, Leslie – Library Trends, 2000
Discusses the results of a nationwide survey (57 survey questions) of academic libraries that investigated fund-raising programs, including personnel involved; goals and costs of fund-raising; library donors, friends, and advisory groups; priorities; and factors of success, including involvement of the director and time on task. A copy of the…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Administrator Role, Costs, Donors

Cottam, Keith M. – Library Trends, 1994
Examines current experience and trends in the roles, functions, and activities of today's library directors, based on a survey of directors of large libraries or library systems. A shift in roles, functions, and activities from predominantly internal affairs to an increasing emphasis on external concerns, including technological, economic, and…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Administrator Responsibility, Administrator Role, Change

Hewitt, Joe A.; Panitch, Judith M. – Library Trends, 2003
Reviews the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) activities regarding special collections. Highlights include local and collaborative approaches; budget pressures; access to special collections; digitization programs; recruiting qualified staff; results of a survey of ARL special collections; and the need for ongoing statistics for special…
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, Access to Information, Budgets, Higher Education

Estabrook, Leigh; And Others – Library Trends, 1992
Discusses the nature of support staff work in research libraries, changing authority structures, and the impact of technology on job responsibilities. A study considering work complexity, supervision, evaluation criteria, control and autonomy, and job satisfaction is reported. (17 references) (EA)
Descriptors: Automation, Cataloging, Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods