In a targeted double-scoring procedure for performance assessments that are used for licensure and certification purposes, a subset of responses receives an independent second rating if the first rating falls into a preidentified critical score range (CSR) where an additional rating would lead to considerably more reliable pass-fail decisions. This study evaluates the CSRs using two approaches--one based on imputation of missing scores and the other based on statistical decision theory--using data from the Performance Assessment for School Leaders (PASL). Results from the evaluation indicate that the currently used CSRs are effective.