Descriptor
| Componential Analysis | 8 |
| Language Universals | 8 |
| Linguistic Theory | 8 |
| Deep Structure | 4 |
| Language Patterns | 4 |
| Semantics | 4 |
| Structural Analysis | 4 |
| Case (Grammar) | 3 |
| Distinctive Features… | 3 |
| Sentence Structure | 3 |
| Transformational Generative… | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Clark, Eve V. | 1 |
| Haviland, Susan E. | 1 |
| Lehrer, Adrienne | 1 |
| Moravcsik, Edith A. | 1 |
| Oliverius, Zdenek F. | 1 |
| Pak, Tae-Yong | 1 |
| Pak, Tae-yong | 1 |
| Starosta, Stanley | 1 |
| Thomas, Owen, Ed. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textPak, Tae-yong – 1971
This paper shows that the proposition, our universal thought process, underlies its linguistic realization, the sentence of a specific language, and provides the theoretical basis for interlingual translation as well as intralingual paraphrase. (An example of componential analysis is shown for some Korean sibling terms.) (Author/AMM)
Descriptors: Componential Analysis, Deep Structure, Korean, Language Universals
Peer reviewedPak, Tae-Yong – Linguistics, 1971
Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Componential Analysis, Distinctive Features (Language), Language Universals
Oliverius, Zdenek F. – 1970
The author argues that a componential analysis of Russian case desinences is possible and useful, and that it consequently deserves a place in the linguistic analysis of Contemporary Standard Russian. The two basic assumptions of the author's theory are: first, that the meaning of cases reflects primarily the relation of substantives to the action…
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Componential Analysis, Descriptive Linguistics, Distinctive Features (Language)
Lehrer, Adrienne – Linguistic Reporter, 1971
Descriptors: Componential Analysis, Deep Structure, Distinctive Features (Language), Language Research
Moravcsik, Edith A. – 1971
The paper constitutes an attempt to provide a nonenumerative characterization of agreeing terms and agreement features. The following pertinent statements turn out to be (near) exceptionless: only coreferential terms agree, and for any given language all agreement features are pronominal ones. Four agreement features, gender, number, definiteness,…
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Componential Analysis, Grammar, Language Patterns
Peer reviewedHaviland, Susan E.; Clark, Eve V. – Journal of Child Language, 1972
This study of the acquisition of kinship terms in English is a test of the hypothesis that lexical items are learned in their order of complexity and of the validity of relational analysis in predicting the order of the acquisition of kinship terms. Earlier studies of kinship terms, Piaget's in particular, are first discussed, as well as the…
Descriptors: Child Language, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Componential Analysis
Thomas, Owen, Ed. – 1967
Articles represent four schools of thought in the field of linguistics: structural, behavioral, transformational, and tagmemic. Summarizing structural linguistics before 1956, John Lotz emphasizes the importance of spoken language and the "internal order" imposed upon "physical and behavioral phenomena," and indicates some of the basic beliefs of…
Descriptors: Behavior Theories, Componential Analysis, Generative Grammar, Grammar
Starosta, Stanley – 1970
In line with current thinking in transformational grammar, syntax as a system can and should be studied before a study is made of the use of that system. Chomsky's lexical redundancy rule is an area for further study, possibly to come closer to defining and achieving explanatory adequacy. If it is observed that English nouns come in two types,…
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Componential Analysis, Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics
