NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 56 results Save | Export
Babcock, Sandra Scharff – 1969
The author begins this paper with, "Let us recognize as axiomatic the statement that sentences in natural languages have the properties of structured, organic wholes." She feels that this statement has several important theoretical consequences, the most interesting (in so far as the current controversy over "surfacism" is…
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Deep Structure, Language Patterns, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Werth, Paul – Linguistics, 1974
This paper is concerned with the semantic, rather than the syntactic, nature of non-restrictive relativization, and its implications. (CK)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Discourse Analysis, Generative Grammar, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lucas, Michael A. – Linguistics, 1974
This article attempts to show that a more rigorous approach to surface structure analysis can reveal distinctions just as subtle as those discovered through analyzing deep structures or transformations. Relative clauses are examined in relation to nominal constructions, and alternatives to restrictive and non-restrictive classifications are…
Descriptors: Descriptive Linguistics, Linguistic Theory, Nouns, Phrase Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ljung, Magnus – Language, 1974
Descriptors: Adjectives, Case (Grammar), Deep Structure, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hetzron, Robert – Linguistics, 1974
Most linguistic theory is analytic in that it begins with a complex unit and breaks it down into components. Criticisms of analytic linguistics are made, and a synthetic approach is proposed which begins with atomic components of language and rules for grouping them into more complex units. (RM)
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Componential Analysis, Deep Structure, Linguistic Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gasparov, B. M. – Linguistics, 1974
The problem of determining the grammatical correctness, as opposed to semantic correctness, of the output of a generative system is discussed. (RM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Generative Grammar, Linguistic Theory, Semantics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Makkai, Adam – Language Sciences, 1974
The verb "take" as presented by Langendoen and McCawley is examined in order to prove to the reader that transformational generative grammar suffers from a disregard of empirical fact. (Author/LG)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Idioms, Language Patterns, Language Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grimes, Joseph E.; And Others – Anthropological Linguistics, 1978
Presents an heuristic procedure, based on cooccurrence of forms, for identifying the closed systems of a language and to show how the systems interlock, differ in meaning, and manifest themselves. (AM)
Descriptors: Descriptive Linguistics, Function Words, Grammar, Language Patterns
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lujan, Marta – Hispania, 1975
Contradicts Pablo Jordan's theory that certain "se" constructions in Spanish are neither passive nor reflexive. It is claimed that syntactic evidence reveals two types of impersonal structures, the impersonal active and the passive reflexive. (Text is in Spanish.) (CK)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics, Grammar, Linguistic Theory
Blaubergs, Maija S. – 1972
The question of whether word meanings have internal structure identical in kind to the syntax of sentences is examined. Evidence is sought for the structural aspects of word meaning and the issue of whether judgements of similarity between words is based on meaning content or on meaning structure is raised. Four hypotheses were tested: (1)…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Deep Structure, Language Patterns, Language Research
Kajita, Masaru – 1967
Despite the similarity in the surface structure, sentences containing a semi-auxiliary (e.g., "avoid,""bother,""happen,""seem,""begin,""tend," etc.) followed by a "to" infinitive or a gerund show a number of differences among themselves in respect to the co-occurrence…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Linguistic Theory, North American English, Sentence Structure
Park, Nahm-Sheik – Language Research, 1968
The discussion throughout this paper is devoted to answering the question: What is the nature of our knowledge of language and what theoretical assumptions does the answer entail for linguistic description? Discussed are--(1) what it means to know a language, (2) the distinction between linguistic competence and performance, (3) justification of…
Descriptors: Child Language, Deep Structure, Grammar, Linguistic Competence
Schwartz, Arthur – 1971
The paper proposes, on the basis of a study of relative clauses and WH-interrogative constructions, to reflect the time-oriented character of the sentence by replacing neutral expressions like "#" with explicit time references like "beginning" and "end." These boundaries are to be universally associated with all…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Form Classes (Languages), Linguistic Theory, Nouns
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Leduc-Adine, Jean-Pierre – Langue Francaise, 1977
This study has as its point of departure the nature of the passive and the linguistic point of view on it taken by textbooks. Topics treated are; passive voice or sentence; surface and deep structure; passive transformation; its relationship to the message; textbooks and their function. (Text is in French.) (AMH)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, French, Language Instruction, Linguistic Theory
Devillers, Colette – 1974
Together with a study of object complements, a succinct description of the Malay classifier construction is given. Object complementation is studied in a generative-transformational framework. For sentence object complements, four types of surface structure are proposed, but it is claimed that two types of deep structure trees underlie the…
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Descriptive Linguistics, Form Classes (Languages), Indonesian
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4