Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Longitudinal Studies | 2 |
| Program Implementation | 2 |
| Young Children | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Child Welfare | 1 |
| Community Programs | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Early Intervention | 1 |
| Educational Finance | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 2 |
| Kindergarten | 1 |
| Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| Georgia | 1 |
| Illinois | 1 |
| Massachusetts | 1 |
| Michigan | 1 |
| Texas | 1 |
| Washington | 1 |
| West Virginia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCortis, Natasha – Children & Society, 2008
Increasingly, governments in wealthy countries are designing early intervention initiatives around principles of "community regeneration" or "place management". Because these initiatives are multi-site, aimed at long-term systemic change, and implemented amidst a range of other initiatives, assessing their quality and outcomes…
Descriptors: Early Intervention, Child Welfare, Foreign Countries, Program Implementation
Download full textEwen, Danielle; Matthews, Hannah – Center for Law and Social Policy, Inc. (CLASP), 2007
This paper explores the range of ways in which school districts are using Title I funds for early education through kindergarten and examines how the implementation of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has impacted those investments. It also makes recommendations for local education agencies (LEAs) interested in creating Title I-funded early education…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Federal Legislation, Second Language Learning, Young Children
