Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Differences | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Gender Differences | 1 |
| Majors (Students) | 1 |
| Man Machine Systems | 1 |
| Natural Language Processing | 1 |
| Nonmajors | 1 |
| STEM Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Innovative Higher Education | 1 |
Author
| Dale Pike | 1 |
| Hoda Eldardiry | 1 |
| Jacob R. Grohs | 1 |
| James Weichert | 1 |
| Junghwan Kim | 1 |
| Larry A. Cox II | 1 |
| Michelle Klopfer | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJunghwan Kim; Michelle Klopfer; Jacob R. Grohs; Hoda Eldardiry; James Weichert; Larry A. Cox II; Dale Pike – Innovative Higher Education, 2025
As generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT become more capable and accessible, their use in educational settings is likely to grow. However, the academic community lacks a comprehensive understanding of the perceptions and attitudes of students and instructors toward these new tools. In the Fall 2023 semester, we surveyed…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Teacher Attitudes, College Students, Student Attitudes
