NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Subkoviak, Michael J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1988
Current methods for obtaining reliability indices for mastery tests can be laborious. This paper offers practitioners tables from which agreement and kappa coefficients can be read directly and provides criterion for acceptable values of agreement and kappa coefficients. (TJH)
Descriptors: Mastery Tests, Statistical Analysis, Test Reliability, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Subkoviak, Michael J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1976
A number of different reliability coefficients have recently been proposed for tests used to differentiate between groups such as masters and nonmasters. One promising index is the proportion of students in a class that are consistently assigned to the same mastery group across two testings. The present paper proposes a single test administration…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Mastery Tests, Mathematical Models, Probability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Peng, Chao-Ying, J.; Subkoviak, Michael J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1980
Huynh (1976) suggested a method of approximating the reliability coefficient of a mastery test. The present study examines the accuracy of Huynh's approximation and also describes a computationally simpler approximation which appears to be generally more accurate than the former. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Mastery Tests, Mathematical Models, Statistical Analysis
Subkoviak, Michael J. – 1985
Current methods of obtaining reliability coefficients for mastery tests are laborious from a practitioner's perspective. Some methods require two test administrations; while others require access to computer facilities and/or advanced measurement and statistical procedures. This report provides tables from which practitioners can read such…
Descriptors: Estimation (Mathematics), Mastery Tests, Statistical Studies, Tables (Data)
Subkoviak, Michael J. – 1976
A number of different definitions and indices of reliability for mastery tests have recently been proposed in an attempt to cope with possible lack of score variability that attenuates traditional coefficients. One promising index that has been suggested is the proportion of students in a group that are consistently assigned to the same mastery…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Mastery Tests, Mathematical Models, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Subkoviak, Michael J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1978
Four different methods for estimating the proportions of testees properly classified as having mastered or not mastered test content are examined, using data from the Scholastic Aptitude Test. All four methods prove reasonably accurate and all show some bias under certain conditions. (JKS)
Descriptors: Bias, Criterion Referenced Tests, Mastery Tests, Measurement
Subkoviak, Michael J.; Harris, Deborah J. – 1984
This study examined three statistical methods for selecting items for mastery tests. One is the pretest-posttest method due to Cox and Vargas (1966); it is computationally simple, but has a number of serious limitations. The second is a latent trait method recommended by van der Linden (1981); it is computationally complex, but has a number of…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Harris, Deborah J.; Subkoviak, Michael J. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1986
This study examined three statistical methods for selecting items for mastery tests: (1) pretest-posttest; (2) latent trait; and (3) agreement statistics. The correlation between the latent trait method and agreement statistics, proposed here as an alternative, was substantial. Results for the pretest-posttest method confirmed its reputed…
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Correlation, Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory
Subkoviak, Michael J. – 1977
Four different procedures were used for estimating the proportion of persons who would be classified consistently as either passing both of two parallel tests or failing both. These four methods were applied at each of four different mastery level scores for each of three different length tests. Data were based on 50 replications of each procedure…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Data Analysis, Data Collection