Descriptor
| Algorithms | 2 |
| Behavioral Science Research | 2 |
| Mathematical Models | 2 |
| Computer Oriented Programs | 1 |
| Cross Sectional Studies | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Equations (Mathematics) | 1 |
| Graphs | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Least Squares Statistics | 1 |
| Longitudinal Studies | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Psychometrika | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pennell, Roger – 1971
It is argued that many investigators utilize the Tucker and Messick (1963) Model with no intention of looking for individual differences or, after utilizing the model, draw improper inferences. An example is given illustrating the difficulties which result from improper use of the model. Several proper methods are outlined. (Author)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Behavioral Science Research, Computer Oriented Programs, Data Analysis
Peer reviewedBijleveld, Catrien C. J. H.; de Leeuw, Jan – Psychometrika, 1991
An alternating least squares method for iteratively fitting the longitudinal reduced-rank regression model is proposed. For social and behavioral science applications, the developed algorithm does not rely on the assumption of multinomial errors and allows for scaling of input and output variables. (SLD)
Descriptors: Algorithms, Behavioral Science Research, Cross Sectional Studies, Equations (Mathematics)


