Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Foreign Countries | 6 |
| Mathematical Models | 6 |
| Multidimensional Scaling | 6 |
| Latent Trait Theory | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Factor Analysis | 2 |
| Maximum Likelihood Statistics | 2 |
| Psychometrics | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| Ability Identification | 1 |
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Berger, Martijn P. F. | 1 |
| Kelderman, Henk | 1 |
| Knol, Dirk L. | 1 |
| Langeheine, Rolf | 1 |
| Leutner, Detlev | 1 |
| Mellenbergh, Gideon J. | 1 |
| Sak, Ugur | 1 |
| Vijn, Pieter | 1 |
| Weinsier, Philip D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 5 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Germany | 2 |
| Netherlands | 2 |
| Belgium | 1 |
| Turkey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkSak, Ugur – Roeper Review, 2009
In this study, psychometric properties of the test of the three-mathematical minds (M3) were investigated. The M3 test was developed based on a multidimensional conception of giftedness to identify mathematically talented students. Participants included 291 middle-school students. Data analysis indicated that the M3 had a 0.73 coefficient as a…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Factor Analysis, Psychometrics, Ability Identification
Peer reviewedLangeheine, Rolf – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1980
Detailed reanalyses of data reported in Studies in Educational Evaluation: Monograph No. 1 by Y. Kashti and Monograph No. 5 by U. Kattmann, 1979, were performed using an explicitly structurally oriented approach via target analysis (PINDIS). Results contradict those reached by Kashti and Kattmann. (RL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Foreign Countries, Hypothesis Testing, Mathematical Models
Download full textKnol, Dirk L.; Berger, Martijn P. F. – 1988
Many multidimensional item response theory (IRT) models have been proposed. A comparison is made between the so-called full information models and the models that use only pairwise information. Three multidimensional models described are: (1) the compensatory model of R. D. Bock and M. Aitken (1981) using the computer program TESTFACT; (2) a model…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Computer Simulation, Computer Uses in Education, Factor Analysis
Peer reviewedLeutner, Detlev; Weinsier, Philip D. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1991
An interest questionnaire with 72 university course descriptions based on a facet design was used to determine whether computer anxiety or computer disinterest was related to interest in or willingness to take selected courses of 200 Belgian and German students. Analysis of variance supports conclusions from the multidimensional scalings. (SLD)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, College Students, Computer Literacy, Course Selection (Students)
Mellenbergh, Gideon J.; Vijn, Pieter – 1980
Data are summarized in Scheuneman's Score x Group x Response frequency table in order to investigate item bias. The data can arise from two different sampling models: (1) multinomial sampling in which a fixed sample size is used and the responses are cross-classified according to score, group, and response; and (2) product-multinomial sampling in…
Descriptors: Black Students, Cognitive Measurement, Foreign Countries, Latent Trait Theory
Kelderman, Henk – 1988
A loglinear item response theory (IRT) model is proposed that relates polytomously scored item responses to a multidimensional latent space. Each item may have a different response function where each item response may be explained by one or more latent traits. Item response functions may follow a partial credit model (D. Andrich, 1978; and G. N.…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Equations (Mathematics), Estimation (Mathematics), Foreign Countries
