Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 2 |
| Equated Scores | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Mathematical Models | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Research Design | 2 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Arithmetic | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Compensatory Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| House, Gary D. | 1 |
| Linn, Robert L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Missouri (Saint Louis) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
House, Gary D. – 1979
The equivalency of achievement results obtained under Title I evaluation models A1 and C1 was examined. Data were reading comprehension and arithmetic scores on the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, administered to fourth, sixth, and eighth grade students in St. Louis, Missouri. The St. Louis Public Schools had traditionally used Model A1, a…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains, Age Differences, Arithmetic
Download full textLinn, Robert L. – 1978
The three RMC models endorsed by the U.S. Office of Education for the evaluation of Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I programs are based on narrowly conceived approaches to evaluation--the measurement of cognitive achievement gains. Each model requires the comparison of observed student performance with an estimate of what level of…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Control Groups
