Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 2 |
| Mathematics Achievement | 2 |
| Misconceptions | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Alternative Assessment | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Concept Formation | 1 |
| Demography | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkInnes, Richard G. – Journal of School Choice, 2012
This article provides examples of how serious misconceptions can result when only "all student" scores from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) are used for simplistic state-to-state comparisons. Suggestions for better treatment are presented. The article also compares Kentucky's eighth grade EXPLORE testing to NAEP…
Descriptors: National Competency Tests, Scoring, Misconceptions, Academic Achievement
Haja, Shajahan; Clarke, David – Mathematics Education Research Journal, 2011
The structure of two-tier testing is such that the first tier consists of a multiple-choice question and the second tier requires justifications for choices of answers made in the first tier. This study aims to evaluate two-tier tasks in "proportion" in terms of students' capacity to write and select justifications and to examine the effect of…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Alternative Assessment, Testing, Misconceptions
