Learning Mathematics through Conversation: Is It as Good as They Say?.

Sfard, Anna; Nesher, Pearla; Streefland, Leen; Cobb, Paul; Mason, John

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ565648

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1998

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: ISSN-0228-0671

EISSN: N/A

Available Date: N/A

Learning Mathematics through Conversation: Is It as Good as They Say?

Sfard, Anna; Nesher, Pearla; Streefland, Leen; Cobb, Paul; Mason, John

For the Learning of Mathematics, v18 n1 p41-51 Feb 1998

Presents three schools of argument on mathematical communication: (1) cognitivist argument; (2) interactionist argument; and (3) neo-pragmatist argument. Distinguishes the mathematical versus talking about mathematics, talking mathematics versus learning the art of mathematical conversation, and the conversation of mathematicians versus students' mathematical discussions. Discusses theorizing about mathematical conversation and learning from practice. Contains 33 references. (ASK)

Descriptors: Classroom Communication, Elementary Secondary Education, Mathematical Linguistics, Mathematics Education

Publication Type: Guides - Classroom - Teacher; Journal Articles

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Author Affiliations: N/A