Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Computer Assisted Testing | 6 |
Mathematics Tests | 6 |
Verbal Tests | 6 |
Adaptive Testing | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Higher Education | 3 |
College Entrance Examinations | 2 |
Equated Scores | 2 |
Test Construction | 2 |
Test Items | 2 |
Test Results | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Bejar, Isaac | 1 |
Eignor, Daniel R. | 1 |
Liang, Longjuan | 1 |
Lin, Miao-Hsiang | 1 |
MacMahon, Alyssa L. | 1 |
Mongroo, Chandra N. | 1 |
Potenza, Maria T. | 1 |
Powers, Donald E. | 1 |
Rijmen, Frank | 1 |
Robin, Frédéric | 1 |
Schaeffer, Gary A. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Graduate Record Examinations | 4 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
MacMahon, Alyssa L.; Mongroo, Chandra N. – Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 2020
Postsecondary mathematics classrooms continue to become more diverse, which implores educators to continue to incorporate more diverse modes of assessment to support all learners. However, researchers have found that mathematics assessment at the postsecondary level has remained mostly stagnant, with traditional, closed-book exams dominating the…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Student Evaluation, Alternative Assessment, Mathematics Education
Robin, Frédéric; Bejar, Isaac; Liang, Longjuan; Rijmen, Frank – ETS Research Report Series, 2016
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of domestic data from the" GRE"® revised General Test, introduced in 2011, were conducted separately for the verbal (VBL) and quantitative (QNT) reasoning measures to evaluate the unidimensionality and local independence assumptions required by item response theory (IRT). Results based on data…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Graduate Study, Verbal Tests, Mathematics Tests
Eignor, Daniel R. – 1993
Procedures used to establish the comparability of scores derived from the College Board Admissions Testing Program (ATP) computer adaptive Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) prototype and the paper-and-pencil SAT are described in this report. Both the prototype, which is made up of Verbal and Mathematics computer adaptive tests (CATs), and a form of…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing
Powers, Donald E.; Potenza, Maria T. – 1996
The degree to which laptop and standard-size desktop computers are likely to produce comparable test results for the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) General Test was studied. Verbal, quantitative, and writing sections of a retired version of the GRE were used, since it was expected that performance on reading passages or mathematics items might…
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education
Schaeffer, Gary A.; And Others – 1995
This report summarizes the results from two studies. The first assessed the comparability of scores derived from linear computer-based (CBT) and computer adaptive (CAT) versions of the three Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) General Test measures. A verbal CAT was taken by 1,507, a quantitative CAT by 1,354, and an analytical CAT by 995…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Equated Scores
Lin, Miao-Hsiang – 1986
Specific questions addressed in this study include how time limits affect a test's construct and predictive validities, how time limits affect an examinee's time allocation and test performance, and whether the assumption about how examinees answer items is valid. Interactions involving an examinee's sex and age are studied. Two parallel forms of…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Computer Assisted Testing, Construct Validity, Difficulty Level