Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 6 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 5 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 6 |
Higher Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
Tennessee | 8 |
Illinois | 1 |
Massachusetts | 1 |
New Jersey | 1 |
New York | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Tennessee (Nashville) | 1 |
Virginia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
American Recovery and… | 5 |
Race to the Top | 5 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Stanton, Larry; Segal, Alison – Mass Insight Education, 2013
A state education agency (SEA) can pull a powerful lever for school turnaround by setting goals publicly and releasing reports on progress toward those goals at turnaround schools to build public support for turnaround efforts. SEAs can gather information for reporting from data they already have available. This report clarifies indicators and…
Descriptors: School Turnaround, State Departments of Education, Agency Role, Educational Objectives
US Department of Education, 2015
The State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Tennessee's annual Race to the Top implementation. The Year 4 report for Phase 2 grantees highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2013 through September 2014. Given that Delaware and…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2014
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Tennessee's annual Race to the Top implementation. The Year 3 report for Phase 1 and 2 grantees highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013. In Year 3,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2013
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Tennessee's second year of Race to the Top implementation. The report highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2011 through September 2012. During Year 2, the Tennessee Department of…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2012
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Tennessee's Year 1 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation to date. Tennessee received its Race to the Top grant in July 2010 as part of the first round of the competition.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
US Department of Education, 2012
This paper describes Tennessee's progress in implementing a comprehensive and coherent approach to education reform from the time of application through June 30, 2011. In particular, this report highlights key accomplishments over the reporting period in the four reform areas: standards and assessments, data systems to support instruction, great…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
Stotsky, Sandra – Education Working Paper Archive, 2007
Many educators choose to believe that learning to read and write is as natural as learning to listen and speak, even though scientifically based research does not support their belief. However, most educators (as well as the public) believe that most students must be taught mathematics to learn it. Moreover, there is a body of research evidence…
Descriptors: Mathematics Teachers, Teacher Certification, Licensing Examinations (Professions), Evaluation Criteria
RAMSEY, CURTIS PAUL – 1961
THE STUDY COMPARED THE ATTITUDES OF AUDIOVISUAL PERSONNEL WITH THE ATTITUDES OF INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL TOWARD THE NEWER EDUCATIONAL MEDIA. THE HYPOTHESIS OF NO DIFFERENCE WAS REJECTED AT THE ONE PERCENT LEVEL. THE INVESTIGATOR SUGGESTS THE NEED FOR PROCEDURES TO BRING ABOUT MODIFICATION OF ATTITUDE TOWARD THE NEWER EDUCATIONAL MEDIA.
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Attitude Measures, Audiovisual Aids, Instructional Innovation