NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)1
Education Level
Audience
Researchers1
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 32 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nishisato, Shizuhiko; Sheu, Wen-Jenn – Psychometrika, 1980
A modification of the method of reciprocal averages for scaling multiple choice data is proposed. The proposed method handles the data in a piecewise fashion and allows for faster convergence to a solution. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Koehler, Roger A. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1974
The purposes of the study were to develop a measure of overconfidence on probabilistic tests, to assess the measurement characteristics of such a measure, and to investigate the relationship of overconfidence on tests to knowledge and to risk-taking propensity. (Author/BB)
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Risk
Frary, Robert B. – Educ Psychol Meas, 1969
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wilcox, Rand R. – Psychometrika, 1983
A procedure for determining the reliability of an examinee knowing k out of n possible multiple choice items given his or her performance on those items is presented. Also, a scoring procedure for determining which items an examinee knows is presented. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Frary, Robert B. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1982
Six different approaches to scoring test data, including number right, correction for guessing, and answer-until-correct, were investigated using Monte Carlo techniques. Modes permitting multiple response showed higher internal consistency, but there was little difference among modes for a validity measure. (JKS)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Duncan, George T.; Milton, E. O. – Psychometrika, 1978
A multiple-answer multiple-choice test is one which offers several alternate choices for each stem and any number of those choices may be considered to be correct. In this article, a class of scoring procedures called the binary class is discussed. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Answer Keys, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Scoring Formulas
Costin, Frank – Educ Psychol Meas, 1970
Within the limitations of the present study, evidence is presented that the use of three-choice items improves the power and discrimination of tests. (PR)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Measurement Instruments, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Eakin, Richard R.; Long, Clifford A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
A scoring technique for true-false tests is presented. The technique, paired item scoring, involves combining two statements and having the student select one of the four resultants possible: true-true, false-true, true-false, and false-false. The combined item is treated as a multiple choice item. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Objective Tests
Yelland, Robert C. – Training and Development Journal, 1976
The feasibility of using multiple choice questions as a reliable procedure in testing trainees is discussed, and suggestions for test construction are offered. (BP)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Group Testing, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Miller, Harry G.; Williams, Reed G. – Educational Technology, 1973
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Item Analysis, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jacobs, Stanley S. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Individual Differences, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Koehler, Roger A. – 1974
A potentially valuable measure of overconfidence on probabilistic multiple-choice tests was evaluated. The measure of overconfidence was based on probabilistic responses to nonsense items embedded in a vocabulary test. The test was administered under both confidence response and conventional choice response directions to 208 undergraduate…
Descriptors: Confidence Testing, Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jaradat, Derar; Sawaged, Sari – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1986
The impact of the Subset Selection Technique (SST) for multiple-choice items on certain properties of a test was compared with that of two other methods, the Number Right and the Correction for Guessing Formula. Results indicated that SST outperformed the other two, producing higher reliability and validity without favoring high risk takers.…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Grade 9, Guessing (Tests), Measurement Techniques
Carver, Ronald P. – J Educ Meas, 1970
Two studies analyze and evaluate the use of the chunk," a small group of meaningfully related words within a sentence, as a test item in reading and listening tests. (PR)
Descriptors: Listening Comprehension, Listening Comprehension Tests, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests
Harvill, Leo M. – 1984
The objectives for this study were to: (1) develop a valid, reliable measure of test-wiseness with equivalent forms for use with students in the health sciences; and (2) determine the level of test-wiseness of entering medical students. The test-wiseness areas included in this study were: similar options, umbrella term, item give-away, convergence…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Measurement Techniques, Medical Students, Multiple Choice Tests
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3