Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Meta Analysis | 3 |
Student Characteristics | 3 |
Synthesis | 3 |
Effect Size | 2 |
Literature Reviews | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Age Differences | 1 |
Age Groups | 1 |
Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
Coding | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Belland, Brian R. | 1 |
Kavale, Kenneth A. | 1 |
Kim, Nam Ju | 1 |
Lefler, Mason | 1 |
Nye, Chad | 1 |
Roberts, Greg | 1 |
Scammacca, Nancy K. | 1 |
Stuebing, Karla K. | 1 |
Vaughn, Sharon | 1 |
Walker, Andrew E. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Belland, Brian R.; Walker, Andrew E.; Kim, Nam Ju; Lefler, Mason – Review of Educational Research, 2017
Computer-based scaffolding assists students as they generate solutions to complex problems, goals, or tasks, helping increase and integrate their higher order skills in the process. However, despite decades of research on scaffolding in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) education, no existing comprehensive meta-analysis has…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Scaffolding (Teaching Technique), STEM Education, Meta Analysis
Scammacca, Nancy K.; Roberts, Greg; Vaughn, Sharon; Stuebing, Karla K. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2015
This meta-analysis synthesizes the literature on interventions for struggling readers in Grades 4 through 12 published between 1980 and 2011. It updates Scammacca et al.'s analysis of studies published between 1980 and 2004. The combined corpus of 82 study-wise effect sizes was meta-analyzed to determine (a) the overall effectiveness of reading…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Intervention, Reading Difficulties, Elementary Secondary Education

Kavale, Kenneth A.; Nye, Chad – Journal of Special Education, 1986
Results of synthesis of 1007 studies on the nature of learning disabilities using indicators in the linguistic, achievement, neuropsychological, and social-behavioral domains, indicated that 75% of learning disabled Ss could be differentiated from normal Ss but only 40% of the variance could be explained. Findings suggest the need for a…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Disability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Disabilities