Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Mild Intellectual Disability | 2 |
| Moderate Intellectual… | 2 |
| Questionnaires | 2 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Attitude Measures | 1 |
| Autism | 1 |
| Caregivers | 1 |
| Coding | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Epistemology | 1 |
| Ethnography | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Annelies de Bildt | 1 |
| Crosbie, Jenny | 1 |
| Ottmann, Goetz | 1 |
| Paula S. Sterkenburg | 1 |
| Saskia Knapen | 1 |
| Suzanne D. M. Derks | 1 |
| Veerle M. M. Andries | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSuzanne D. M. Derks; Annelies de Bildt; Veerle M. M. Andries; Saskia Knapen; Paula S. Sterkenburg – Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2025
Background: To assess epistemic trust in people with intellectual disabilities, we adapted the Questionnaire Epistemic Trust (QET) for people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning (MMID/BIF). Method: We investigated the factor structure, the reliability and construct validity in 147 adults. Results:…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Questionnaires, Epistemology, Trust (Psychology)
Ottmann, Goetz; Crosbie, Jenny – Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 2013
People with intellectual disabilities and their families are increasingly being asked to provide input into the services they receive. Under the aegis of the United Nation Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, support plans crucially depend on a participant's articulation of his or her preferences and life goals. Yet, research…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Intellectual Disability, Comparative Analysis, Research Methodology
