Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Minority Groups | 7 |
Test Bias | 7 |
Standards | 5 |
Testing Problems | 5 |
Test Construction | 4 |
Test Items | 4 |
Court Litigation | 3 |
Item Analysis | 3 |
Culture Fair Tests | 2 |
Standardized Tests | 2 |
State Legislation | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Measurement:… | 7 |
Author
Bond, Lloyd | 1 |
Cardenas, Jose | 1 |
Dolan, Conor V. | 1 |
Drasgow, Fritz | 1 |
Faggen, Jane | 1 |
Jaeger, Richard M. | 1 |
Linn, Robert L. | 1 |
McCarty, Joan First | 1 |
Weiss, John | 1 |
Wicherts, Jelte M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Opinion Papers | 5 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Teacher Examinations | 1 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wicherts, Jelte M.; Dolan, Conor V. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2010
Measurement invariance with respect to groups is an essential aspect of the fair use of scores of intelligence tests and other psychological measurements. It is widely believed that equal factor loadings are sufficient to establish measurement invariance in confirmatory factor analysis. Here, it is shown why establishing measurement invariance…
Descriptors: Factor Structure, Intelligence Tests, Intelligence Quotient, Factor Analysis

Weiss, John – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987
Differences in test scores can be attributed to various causes, including genuine knowledge differences, test-taking abilities, and irrelevant and biased questions. The Golden Rule reform is a safeguard to ensure that standardized tests measure relevant knowledge differences between test takers and not irrelevant, culturally specific factors. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Culture Fair Tests, Minority Groups, Standardized Tests, Standards

Bond, Lloyd – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987
This article suggests that mechanical application of Golden Rule-like procedures is inappropriate. The fundamental idea embodied in them, namely, that of taking issues of equity into account in test construction, may reasonably be done without doing violence to test validity. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Item Analysis, Minority Groups, Standards

Jaeger, Richard M. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987
This is a reprint of a 1986 letter by the former president of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) to New York and California legislators. The author outlines why NCME is opposed to legislative initiatives to extend Golden Rule procedures to tests in those states. (JAZ)
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Letters (Correspondence), Minority Groups, Standards

Faggen, Jane – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987
This article provides an overview of the "Golden Rule" issue, including a summary of legislative and judicial activity aimed at extending the "Golden Rule" idea, the opposition of professional associations to such proposals, and activity at the Educational Testing Service to take differential item functioning into account in…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Insurance Companies, Licensing Examinations (Professions), Minority Groups

McCarty, Joan First; Cardenas, Jose – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1986
Test scores are being used for a variety of inappropriate purposes, often to the detriment of minorities. This article recounts recent evidence on misuse of testing, offers strategies for preventing abuse, and urges professionals to take on active roles in preventing misuse of their wares. (LMO)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Culture Fair Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Minimum Competency Testing

Linn, Robert L.; Drasgow, Fritz – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1987
This article discusses the application of the Golden Rule procedure to items of the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Using item response theory, the analyses indicate that the Golden Rule procedures are ineffective in detecting biased items and may undermine the reliability and validity of tests. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Difficulty Level, Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory