Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Author
Andrich, David | 4 |
Constable, Elizabeth | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Australia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Andrich, David – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2013
Assessments in response formats with ordered categories are ubiquitous in the social and health sciences. Although the assumption that the ordering of the categories is working as intended is central to any interpretation that arises from such assessments, testing that this assumption is valid is not standard in psychometrics. This is surprising…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Classification, Statistical Analysis, Models
Andrich, David – Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2011
This commentary examines the role of the unit from the perspective of the definition of measurement in physics as the ratio of two magnitudes, one of which is defined as the unit; it is an important and timely contribution to measurement in the social sciences. There are many different points that could be commented upon, but the author will…
Descriptors: Social Sciences, Physics, Psychometrics, Item Response Theory

Andrich, David – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2002
Articulates a framework that can place the Outcomes Based Education movement in a historical context and by so doing advance its discourse on assessment. Reviews the development and structure of the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (B. Bloom et al., 1956) and the structure of Student Outcome Statements in Western Australia and explores the…
Descriptors: Classification, Educational Assessment, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods
Constable, Elizabeth; Andrich, David – 1984
In circumstances where judges are required to make ratings of performance, it is usually required to have two or more raters who are trained to agree on independent ratings of the same performance. It is suggested that such a requirement may produce the paradox of attenuation associated with item analysis, in which too high a correlation between…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Interrater Reliability, Interviews