Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Educational Methods | 1 |
| Educational Theories | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| Evidence | 1 |
| Gifted | 1 |
| Measurement Objectives | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| Models | 1 |
| Outcome Measures | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| High Ability Studies | 1 |
Author
| Baker, Joseph | 1 |
| Schorer, Jorg | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSchorer, Jorg; Baker, Joseph – High Ability Studies, 2012
Ziegler and Phillipson make a strong case for the need to reconsider traditional models of gifted education. Although their evidence and argument are compelling, the reviewers argue that several additional steps are needed to justify the theoretical foundation of the theory in order to facilitate its evaluation by researchers. First, Ziegler and…
Descriptors: Gifted, Evidence, Effect Size, Academically Gifted
