Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Associative Learning | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Novelty (Stimulus Dimension) | 2 |
| Ambiguity (Semantics) | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Competition | 1 |
| Concept Mapping | 1 |
| Infants | 1 |
| Interaction | 1 |
| Language Acquisition | 1 |
| Prediction | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| McMurray, Bob | 2 |
| Samuelson, Larissa K. | 2 |
| Horst, Jessica S. | 1 |
| Kucker, Sarah C. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kucker, Sarah C.; McMurray, Bob; Samuelson, Larissa K. – Cognitive Science, 2018
Identifying the referent of novel words is a complex process that young children do with relative ease. When given multiple objects along with a novel word, children select the most novel item, sometimes retaining the word-referent link. Prior work is inconsistent, however, on the role of object novelty. Two experiments examine 18-month-old…
Descriptors: Infants, Associative Learning, Vocabulary, Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)
McMurray, Bob; Horst, Jessica S.; Samuelson, Larissa K. – Psychological Review, 2012
Classic approaches to word learning emphasize referential ambiguity: In naming situations, a novel word could refer to many possible objects, properties, actions, and so forth. To solve this, researchers have posited constraints, and inference strategies, but assume that determining the referent of a novel word is isomorphic to learning. We…
Descriptors: Word Recognition, Vocabulary Development, Language Acquisition, Interaction

Peer reviewed
Direct link
