NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Phillip Dawson; Zi Yan; Anastasiya Lipnevich; Joanna Tai; David Boud; Paige Mahoney – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
Feedback can be powerful, but its effects are dependent on what students do. There has been intensive research in recent years under the banner of 'feedback literacy' to understand how to help students make the most of feedback. Although there are instruments to measure feedback literacy, they largely measure perceptions and orientations rather…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Multiple Literacies, Measures (Individuals), Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ryan, Tracii; Henderson, Michael; Ryan, Kris; Kennedy, Gregor – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2021
Current conceptualisations of feedback contend that it should be a learner-centred process. In practice, however, text-based feedback comments from teachers are a convenient and common source of feedback information, despite appearing to be contra-indicative of learner-centred models. This raises the question of how teachers can tackle the design…
Descriptors: Student Centered Learning, Feedback (Response), Teaching Methods, Research Reports
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vulperhorst, Jonne; Lutz, Christel; de Kleijn, Renske; van Tartwijk, Jan – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2018
To refine selective admission models, we investigate which measure of prior achievement has the best predictive validity for academic success in university. We compare the predictive validity of three core high school subjects to the predictive validity of high school grade point average (GPA) for academic achievement in a liberal arts university…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, Foreign Countries, Grade Point Average, Selective Admission
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kearney, Sean; Perkins, Timothy; Kennedy-Clark, Shannon – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2016
The purpose of this paper is to provide a proof of concept of a collaborative peer-, self- and lecturer assessment processes. The research presented here is part of an ongoing study on self- and peer assessments in higher education. The authentic assessment for sustainable learning (AASL) model is evaluated in terms of the correlations between…
Descriptors: Self Evaluation (Individuals), Peer Evaluation, Summative Evaluation, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bieri, Christine; Schuler, Patricia – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2011
There has been increasing interest in assessing teachers' cross-curricular competencies as a result of reforms in teacher education in Switzerland. At Zurich University of Teacher Education, future students who do not have formal qualifications are required to pass several examinations and a test, which is known as an "assessment…
Descriptors: Student Teachers, Student Evaluation, Predictive Validity, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gonyea, Nathan E.; Gangi, Joseph M. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2012
A growing body of research has investigated the comments by students on websites that offer evaluations of college faculty. This corpus includes both quantitative and qualitative studies that each use a different scheme for classifying/analysing student comments, which makes the comparison of findings across studies impossible. The present study…
Descriptors: Grounded Theory, College Students, College Faculty, Electronic Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhang, Bo; Johnston, Lucy; Kilic, Gulsen Bagci – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2008
Peer and self-ratings have been strongly recommended as the means to adjust individual contributions to group work. To evaluate the quality of student ratings, previous research has primarily explored the validity of these ratings, as indicated by the degree of agreement between student and teacher ratings. This research describes a…
Descriptors: Generalizability Theory, Teaching Methods, Reliability, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van der Schaaf, M. F.; Stokking, K. M. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2008
Developing and using a design for teacher portfolio assessment is a complex process including several components: the domain to be assessed (the teacher competences), the content standards or criteria, the portfolio format, the completion of the format (by teachers) with content, and the scoring of the portfolios (by raters). For a portfolio…
Descriptors: Portfolios (Background Materials), Portfolio Assessment, Scoring, Standards