Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Data Collection | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Evidence | 1 |
Language Processing | 1 |
Meta Analysis | 1 |
Methods | 1 |
Randomized Controlled Trials | 1 |
Research and Development | 1 |
Synthesis | 1 |
Test Reliability | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Research Synthesis Methods | 2 |
Author
Amanda Konet | 1 |
Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit | 1 |
Emlyn R. Williams | 1 |
Gerald Gartlehner | 1 |
Graham Booth | 1 |
Hans-Peter Piepho | 1 |
Ian Thomas | 1 |
Karen Crotty | 1 |
Laurence V. Madden | 1 |
Leila Kahwati | 1 |
Meera Viswanathan | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hans-Peter Piepho; Laurence V. Madden; Emlyn R. Williams – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Methods of network meta-analysis (NMA) can be classified as arm-based and contrast-based approaches. There are several arm-based approaches, and some of these have been criticized because they recover inter-study information and hence do not obey the principle of concurrent control. Here, we point out that recovery of inter-study information in…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Models, Methods, Data Collection
Gerald Gartlehner; Leila Kahwati; Rainer Hilscher; Ian Thomas; Shannon Kugley; Karen Crotty; Meera Viswanathan; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit; Graham Booth; Nathaniel Erskine; Amanda Konet; Robert Chew – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Data extraction is a crucial, yet labor-intensive and error-prone part of evidence synthesis. To date, efforts to harness machine learning for enhancing efficiency of the data extraction process have fallen short of achieving sufficient accuracy and usability. With the release of large language models (LLMs), new possibilities have emerged to…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Evidence, Synthesis, Language Processing