NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 40 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maxi Schulz; Malte Kramer; Oliver Kuss; Tim Mathes – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
In sparse data meta-analyses (with few trials or zero events), conventional methods may distort results. Although better-performing one-stage methods have become available in recent years, their implementation remains limited in practice. This study examines the impact of using conventional methods compared to one-stage models by re-analysing…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Data Analysis, Research Methodology, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schneider, Jürgen; Backfisch, Iris; Lachner, Andreas – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Researchers increasingly engage in adopting open science practices in the field of research syntheses, such as preregistration. Preregistration is a central open science practice in empirical research to enhance transparency in the research process and it gains steady adoption in the context of conducting research synthesis. From an…
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Models, Scientific Research, Credibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hooijmans, Carlijn R.; Donders, Rogier; Magnuson, Kristen; Wever, Kimberley E.; Ergün, Mehmet; Rooney, Andrew A.; Walker, Vickie; Langendam, Miranda W. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
Since the early 1990s the number of systematic reviews (SR) of animal studies has steadily increased. There is, however, little guidance on when and how to conduct a meta-analysis of human-health-related animal studies. To gain insight about the methods that are currently used we created an overview of the key characteristics of published…
Descriptors: Animals, Health Education, Educational Research, Meta Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hans-Peter Piepho; Laurence V. Madden; Emlyn R. Williams – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Methods of network meta-analysis (NMA) can be classified as arm-based and contrast-based approaches. There are several arm-based approaches, and some of these have been criticized because they recover inter-study information and hence do not obey the principle of concurrent control. Here, we point out that recovery of inter-study information in…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Models, Methods, Data Collection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Remiro-Azócar, Antonio; Heath, Anna; Baio, Gianluca – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
We examine four important considerations in the development of covariate adjustment methodologies for indirect treatment comparisons. First, we consider potential advantages of weighting versus outcome modeling, placing focus on bias-robustness. Second, we outline why model-based extrapolation may be required and useful, in the specific context of…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Outcomes of Treatment, Comparative Analysis, Barriers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Efthimiou, Orestis; White, Ian R. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Standard models for network meta-analysis simultaneously estimate multiple relative treatment effects. In practice, after estimation, these multiple estimates usually pass through a formal or informal selection procedure, eg, when researchers draw conclusions about the effects of the best performing treatment in the network. In this paper, we…
Descriptors: Models, Meta Analysis, Network Analysis, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Qianying; Liao, Jing; Lapata, Mirella; Macleod, Malcolm – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
We sought to apply natural language processing to the task of automatic risk of bias assessment in preclinical literature, which could speed the process of systematic review, provide information to guide research improvement activity, and support translation from preclinical to clinical research. We use 7840 full-text publications describing…
Descriptors: Risk, Natural Language Processing, Medical Research, Networks
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yoneoka, Daisuke; Omae, Katsuhiro; Henmi, Masayuki; Eguchi, Shinto – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
The number of clinical prediction models sharing the same prediction task has increased in the medical literature. However, evidence synthesis methodologies that use the results of these prediction models have not been sufficiently studied, particularly in the context of meta-analysis settings where only summary statistics are available. In…
Descriptors: Prediction, Task Analysis, Medical Research, Outcomes of Treatment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Seo, Michael; Furukawa, Toshi A.; Karyotaki, Eirini; Efthimiou, Orestis – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Clinical prediction models are widely used in modern clinical practice. Such models are often developed using individual patient data (IPD) from a single study, but often there are IPD available from multiple studies. This allows using meta-analytical methods for developing prediction models, increasing power and precision. Different studies,…
Descriptors: Prediction, Models, Patients, Data Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Shaw, Liz; Nunns, Michael; Briscoe, Simon; Anderson, Rob; Thompson Coon, Jo – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
The short time frame associated with rapid reviews can be challenging for researchers conducting qualitative evidence synthesis. In these circumstances a Best-Fit Framework Synthesis, drawing upon existing theory and/or research, may be conducted to rapidly make sense of qualitative evidence. This article discusses a "Rapid Best-Fit"…
Descriptors: Synthesis, Qualitative Research, Evidence, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Konstantina Chalkou; Tasnim Hamza; Pascal Benkert; Jens Kuhle; Chiara Zecca; Gabrielle Simoneau; Fabio Pellegrini; Andrea Manca; Matthias Egger; Georgia Salanti – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Some patients benefit from a treatment while others may do so less or do not benefit at all. We have previously developed a two-stage network meta-regression prediction model that synthesized randomized trials and evaluates how treatment effects vary across patient characteristics. In this article, we extended this model to combine different…
Descriptors: Medical Research, Outcomes of Treatment, Risk, Randomized Controlled Trials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Siegel, Lianne; Chu, Haitao – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Reference intervals, or reference ranges, aid medical decision-making by containing a pre-specified proportion (e.g., 95%) of the measurements in a representative healthy population. We recently proposed three approaches for estimating a reference interval from a meta-analysis based on a random effects model: a frequentist approach, a Bayesian…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Meta Analysis, Intervals, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huang, Ao; Komukai, Sho; Friede, Tim; Hattori, Satoshi – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
Prospective registration of study protocols in clinical trial registries is a useful way to minimize the risk of publication bias in meta-analysis, and several clinical trial registries are available nowadays. However, they are mainly used as a tool for searching studies and information submitted to the registries has not been utilized as…
Descriptors: Publications, Bias, Meta Analysis, Selection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bakbergenuly, Ilyas; Hoaglin, David C.; Kulinskaya, Elena – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
For meta-analysis of studies that report outcomes as binomial proportions, the most popular measure of effect is the odds ratio (OR), usually analyzed as log(OR). Many meta-analyses use the risk ratio (RR) and its logarithm because of its simpler interpretation. Although log(OR) and log(RR) are both unbounded, use of log(RR) must ensure that…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Risk, Research Problems, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Joshi, Megha; Pustejovsky, James E.; Beretvas, S. Natasha – Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
The most common and well-known meta-regression models work under the assumption that there is only one effect size estimate per study and that the estimates are independent. However, meta-analytic reviews of social science research often include multiple effect size estimates per primary study, leading to dependence in the estimates. Some…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Regression (Statistics), Models, Effect Size
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3