NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)3
Since 2006 (last 20 years)11
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 53 results Save | Export
Rhode Island Department of Education, 2019
Rhode Island educators believe that implementing a fair, accurate, and meaningful educator evaluation and support system will help improve teaching, learning, and school leadership. The primary purpose of the Rhode Island Model Building Administrator Evaluation and Support System (Rhode Island Model) is to help all building administrators improve.…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods, Models
Bullis, Brian – ProQuest LLC, 2014
The purpose of this study was focused on the various perceived impacts created by the expansion to a four-tier teacher performance evaluation rating model which would inform educational leaders in the State of Illinois. By studying the experiences of principals in two other states who previously underwent the same change, Florida and…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Teacher Effectiveness, Models
Rhode Island Department of Education, 2018
Rhode Island educators believe that implementing a fair, accurate, and meaningful educator evaluation and support system will help improve teaching, learning, and school leadership. The primary purpose of the Rhode Island Model Building Administrator Evaluation and Support System (Rhode Island Model) is to help all building administrators improve.…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods, Models
Teacher Incentive Fund, US Department of Education, 2016
The U.S. Department of Education (ED) expects all Teacher Incentive Fund (TIF) grantees to conduct an evaluation of their programs. Experience with earlier rounds of TIF grants has shown that evaluations can provide valuable information for managing and improving TIF-supported activities, as well as evidence that these activities have had a…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Questioning Techniques, Qualitative Research, Statistical Analysis
Clifford, Matthew; Hansen, Ulcca Joshni; Wraight, Sara – Center on Great Teachers and Leaders, 2014
Across the country, states and districts are designing principal evaluation systems as a means of improving leadership, learning, and school performance. Principal evaluation systems hold potential for supporting leaders' learning and sense of accountability for instructional excellence and student performance. Principal evaluation also is an…
Descriptors: Principals, Administrator Evaluation, Program Development, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Derrington, Mary Lynne; Sanders, Kellie – AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 2011
A disconnect exists between principal leadership expectations and the actual practice of supervision and evaluation of principals. Increased principal responsibilities and rigorous standards require that a new approach to principal evaluation be considered. The authors provide a framework for a multi-dimensional approach to principal supervision…
Descriptors: Supervisor Supervisee Relationship, Leadership, Principals, Administrator Evaluation
Hemati, Hamidreza – Online Submission, 2011
The purpose of the research was to study the performance of the supervisors in the aspects leadership, communication, and task managing by the "360 degree feedback" method. A qualitative research was used to carry out the research study. The researcher formulated three questions that guided the study. An opinionnaire which included 23…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Feedback (Response), Qualitative Research, Observation
Lipscomb, Stephen; Chiang, Hanley; Gill, Brian – Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., 2012
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania plans to develop a new statewide evaluation system for teachers and principals in its public schools by school year 2013-2014. To inform the development of this evaluation system, the Team Pennsylvania Foundation (Team PA) undertook the first phase of the Pennsylvania Teacher and Principal Evaluation…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Models, Outcomes of Education, Teacher Evaluation
Lipscomb, Stephen; Chiang, Hanley; Gill, Brian – Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., 2012
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania plans to develop a new statewide evaluation system for teachers and principals in its public schools by school year 2013-2014. To inform the development of this evaluation system, the Team Pennsylvania Foundation (Team PA) undertook the first phase of the Pennsylvania Teacher and Principal Evaluation…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Models, Outcomes of Education, Teacher Evaluation
Lester, Dennis – ProQuest LLC, 2010
Conducting a worthwhile assessment of the performance of senior leaders such as university presidents poses unique challenges for public institutions of higher education. One of the most difficult issues is determining the "content" and "format" of the assessment instrument. Due to the breadth and complexity of the job, the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Focus Groups, College Presidents, Test Construction
Hershberg, Theodore, Ed.; Robertson-Kraft, Claire, Ed. – Harvard Education Press, 2009
This book offers an ambitious new system for evaluating, compensating, and providing professional development for school teachers and administrators. In this realigned system, new forms of accountability are introduced, but they go hand in hand with new rewards and access to enhanced forms of professional development to help educators succeed in…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Educational Change, Rewards, Accountability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Herman, Jerry J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1988
Because competency evaluation is such a critical part of educational administration, a clear, unbiased system for evaluating administrators is needed. This article proposes a model with clearly stated competency areas, a list of example indicators, an evidence requirement, and weighted competencies. Includes five figures. (MLH)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Esposito, James P. – College Student Journal, 1974
A procedure for evaluating supervisory effectiveness is presented including a sample survey format which may be used or modified. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zakrajsek, Barbra – NASSP Bulletin, 1979
Fifteen models for evaluating the principal are presented and the strengths and weaknesses of their components are analyzed. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
March, James C.; March, James G. – Administrative Science Quarterly, 1978
The attempt is both to illuminate how a particular system of careers (of superintendents in this case) might arise from a series of elementary decisions with respect to job exits and to connect a theory of organizational careers more explicitly with theories of other social pairings. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Evaluation, Administrators, Educational Research
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4