NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)6
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
National Longitudinal Survey…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 19 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hahs-Vaughn, Debbie L.; McWayne, Christine M.; Bulotsky-Shearer, Rebecca J.; Wen, Xiaoli; Faria, Ann-Marie – Evaluation Review, 2011
Complex survey data are collected by means other than simple random samples. This creates two analytical issues: nonindependence and unequal selection probability. Failing to address these issues results in underestimated standard errors and biased parameter estimates. Using data from the nationally representative Head Start Family and Child…
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Disadvantaged Youth, Probability, Early Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hale, William W., III; Raaijmakers, Quinten A. W.; Muris, Peter; van Hoof, Anne; Meeus, Wim H. J. – Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2009
Background: This study investigates whether anxiety and depressive disorder symptoms of adolescents from the general community are best described by a model that assumes they are indicative of one general factor or by a model that assumes they are two distinct disorders with parallel growth processes. Additional analyses were conducted to explore…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Severity (of Disability), Depression (Psychology), Anxiety
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Berzin, Stephanie Cosner – Research on Social Work Practice, 2010
Objectives: This study seeks to examine the relationship between foster care and outcomes using multiple comparison methods to account for factors that put foster youth at risk independent of care. Methods: Using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997, matching, propensity scoring, and comparisons to the general population are used to…
Descriptors: Child Welfare, Matched Groups, Foster Care, At Risk Persons
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Douglas L. – Infants and Young Children, 1997
Describes a model for team developmental assessment of high-risk infants using a fiber-optic "distance learning" televideo network in south-central New York. An arena style transdisciplinary play-based assessment model was adapted for use across the televideo connection and close simulation of convention assessment procedures was…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Developmental Delays, Disability Identification, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gutierrez, Peter M. – Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 2006
This article briefly reviews key issues in adolescent suicide risk assessment and proposes that assessing risk and protective factors in combination has the best probability of informing the field's understanding of this complex problem. Several newer measures are described along with summaries of their psychometric properties. A recommended…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Evaluation, Adolescents, Suicide
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Baird, Christopher; Wagner, Dennis; Healy, Theresa; Johnson, Kristen – Child Welfare, 1999
Compared reliability of three widely used child protective service risk-assessment models (one actuarial, two consensus based). Found that, although no system approached 100% interrater reliability, raters employing the actuarial model made consistent estimates of risk for a high percentage of cases they assessed. Interrater reliability for the…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Child Welfare, Children, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Davidson-Arad, Bilha – Social Indicators Research, 2005
Quality of life (QOL) is usually assessed in terms of levels. This paper, in contrast, examines the structure of the quality of life of its subjects: two groups of children at risk, children who were kept at home and those who were removed from home. The social workers who made the decisions were asked to assess the children's quality of life…
Descriptors: Social Work, Quality of Life, At Risk Persons, Caseworkers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Levenson, Jill S.; Morin, John W. – Child Welfare, 2006
Despite continuing improvements in risk assessment for child protective services (CPS) and movement toward actuarial prediction of child maltreatment, current models have not adequately addressed child sexual abuse. Sexual abuse cases present unique and ambiguous indicators to the investigating professional, and risk factors differ from those…
Descriptors: Child Abuse, Sexual Abuse, Child Safety, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Savage, Hallie E.; And Others – Infant-Toddler Intervention: The Transdisciplinary Journal, 1994
This article presents a rationale for comprehensive developmental assessment for infants with cleft palates/lips and related disorders. The assessment model is based on risk factors influencing early development and on clinical research on developmental outcomes. Implications on the clinical assessment process and early intervention are discussed.…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Child Development, Cleft Palate, Congenital Impairments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weaver, Christopher M.; Meyer, Robert G.; Van Nort, James J.; Tristan, Luciano – Assessment, 2006
The authors compared 2-, 3-, 4-factor, and 2-factor/4-facet Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) models in a previously unpublished sample of 1,566 adult male sex offenders assessed under applied clinical conditions as part of a comprehensive state-mandated community notification risk assessment procedure. "Testlets" significantly…
Descriptors: Models, Sexual Abuse, At Risk Persons, Factor Structure
Doueck, Howard J.; And Others – Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 1992
This article examines issues that child protective agencies might consider when evaluating the impact of risk assessment implementation on service delivery. The paper recommends using qualitative and quantitative measures in a process and an outcome evaluation to determine the degree of model implementation and the impact of implementation on case…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Child Abuse, Child Welfare, Delivery Systems
Bergen, Doris – 1994
This text is on transdisciplinary team assessment of infants and toddlers at developmental risk and emphasizes both the dynamics (interpersonal strategies) and the mechanics (team assessment strategies) of teamwork. Emphasis is on assessment for the development of Individualized Family Service Plans. Chapter 1 reviews major developmental…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Decision Making, Disabilities, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carran, Deborah T.; Scott, Keith G. – Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1992
Epidemiological techniques were used to reanalyze studies that had longitudinally tracked preschool or kindergarten children, to determine results of screens for the identification of educationally at-risk children. A paradigm shift is recommended, away from longitudinal studies for predictive validity and toward risk analysis and interpretation.…
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Early Identification, Epidemiology, Evaluation Methods
Jumper-Thurman, Pamela; Plested, Barbara A.; Edwards, Ruth W.; Helm, Heather M.; Oetting, Eugene R. – 2001
The effects of alcohol and other drug abuse are recognized as a serious problem in U.S. communities. Policy efforts and increased law enforcement have only a minimal impact if prevention strategies are not consistent with the community's level of readiness, are not culturally relevant, and are not community-specific. A model has been developed for…
Descriptors: Alcoholism, American Indians, At Risk Persons, Community Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Crocker, Allen C. – Mental Retardation, 1992
This paper presents a schema for measuring the effects of prevention programs in mental retardation, using 43 items that are quantifiable, accessible, and pertinent to disability outcomes. The items relate to service indicators, risk indicators, and incidence/prevalence information in the prenatal, perinatal, and childhood periods. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Check Lists, Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2