Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Creative Thinking | 2 |
| Creativity Tests | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Alternative Assessment | 1 |
| Automation | 1 |
| Computer Software | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Effect Size | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Torrance Tests of Creative… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSelcuk Acar; Peter Organisciak; Denis Dumas – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
In this three-study investigation, we applied various approaches to score drawings created in response to both Form A and Form B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Figural (broadly TTCT-F) as well as the Multi-Trial Creative Ideation task (MTCI). We focused on TTCT-F in Study 1, and utilizing a random forest classifier, we achieved 79% and…
Descriptors: Scoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Models, Correlation
Download full textPeter Organisciak; Selcuk Acar; Denis Dumas; Kelly Berthiaume – Grantee Submission, 2023
Automated scoring for divergent thinking (DT) seeks to overcome a key obstacle to creativity measurement: the effort, cost, and reliability of scoring open-ended tests. For a common test of DT, the Alternate Uses Task (AUT), the primary automated approach casts the problem as a semantic distance between a prompt and the resulting idea in a text…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, Creative Thinking
