Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Course Evaluation | 2 |
| Models | 2 |
| Pretesting | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Anatomy | 1 |
| Behavioral Objectives | 1 |
| Comparative Testing | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Instruction | 1 |
| Computer Programs | 1 |
| Computer Simulation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Allen, Lauren K. | 1 |
| Eagleson, Roy | 1 |
| Gorth, William P. | 1 |
| Wightman, Lawrence E. | 1 |
| de Ribaupierre, Sandrine | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkAllen, Lauren K.; Eagleson, Roy; de Ribaupierre, Sandrine – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2016
Neuroanatomy is one of the most challenging subjects in anatomy, and novice students often experience difficulty grasping the complex three-dimensional (3D) spatial relationships. This study evaluated a 3D neuroanatomy e-learning module, as well as the relationship between spatial abilities and students' knowledge in neuroanatomy. The study's…
Descriptors: Anatomy, Neurosciences, Undergraduate Students, Medical Students
Download full textGorth, William P.; Wightman, Lawrence E. – 1969
The Comprehensive Achievement Monitoring (CAM) model for project evaluation is compared with the usual classroom testing and pretest-posttest approaches. All three techniques are described and then examined in detail with respect to their advantages and limitations. The resources of project CAM in the areas of urban education and computer software…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Behavioral Objectives, Comparative Testing
