Descriptor
Decision Making | 4 |
Decision Making Skills | 4 |
Information Processing | 4 |
Models | 4 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Probability | 2 |
Analysis of Variance | 1 |
Behavior Theories | 1 |
Career Choice | 1 |
Court Litigation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of the NAWDAC | 1 |
Author
Fadely, Dean | 1 |
Goodman, Barbara Ettinger | 1 |
Lichtenstein, Sarah | 1 |
Osborn, William C. | 1 |
Schlossberg, Nancy K. | 1 |
Slovic, Paul | 1 |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Osborn, William C.; Goodman, Barbara Ettinger – 1966
This report presents the results of research that examined widely diverse decision problems and attempted to specify their common behavior elements. To take into account the psychological complexity of most real-life decision problems, and to develop a tentative organization of decision behavior that will embrace the many, highly diverse types of…
Descriptors: Behavior Theories, Decision Making, Decision Making Skills, Information Processing

Schlossberg, Nancy K. – Journal of the NAWDAC, 1976
The author presents a decision-making model for women who are in the process of making career decisions and choices. Implications for going through this process are discussed. (HLM)
Descriptors: Career Choice, Cognitive Processes, Decision Making, Decision Making Skills
Comparison of Bayesian and Regression Approaches to the Study of Information Processing in Judgment.
Slovic, Paul; Lichtenstein, Sarah – 1970
Most research on information utilization in judgment and decision making has followed two basic approaches: "regression" and "Bayesian." Each has characteristic tasks and characteristic information that must be processed to accomplish these tasks. There has been a tendency to work within a single approach with minimal communication between the…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Cues
Fadely, Dean – 1982
College debaters who go to law school are often surprised by the differences between the processes that take place in the court of reason and the process that takes place in the court of law. The court of reason relies mainly on authoritative testimony, while the court of law relies on direct evidence. Evidence in the court of reason is either…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Court Litigation, Court Role, Debate