Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Democracy | 8 |
Evaluation Methods | 8 |
Models | 8 |
Citizen Participation | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Policy Formation | 2 |
Action Research | 1 |
Citizenship Education | 1 |
Civics | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
American Journal of Evaluation | 2 |
Assessment & Evaluation in… | 1 |
Compare | 1 |
Educational Evaluation and… | 1 |
International Education… | 1 |
New Directions for Evaluation | 1 |
Author
Bundi, Pirmin | 1 |
Curtis, Will | 1 |
Davies, Lynn | 1 |
House, Ernest R. | 1 |
Howe, Kenneth R. | 1 |
Levin, Henry M. | 1 |
Mapiasse, Sulaiman | 1 |
McDonnell, Jane | 1 |
Pattyn, Valérie | 1 |
Picciotto, Robert | 1 |
Schlessman-Frost, Amy | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 7 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 9 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Indonesia | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bundi, Pirmin; Pattyn, Valérie – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
Evaluations are considered of key importance for a well-functioning democracy. Against this background, it is vital to assess whether and how evaluation models approach the role of citizens. This paper is the first in presenting a review of citizen involvement in the main evaluation models which are commonly distinguished in the field. We present…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Democracy, Citizen Participation
Picciotto, Robert – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
The adversary evaluation model emerged in a context that favored democratic debate. It was successfully used in a variety of sectors following its inception, but it was abandoned once neo-liberal thinking and goal achievement approaches became dominant. It is time to give it a second chance. The judicial evaluation model (JEM) relies on human…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Democracy, Justice
McDonnell, Jane; Curtis, Will – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2014
This paper reports on an action research project into the development of a "democratic feedback model" with students on an education studies programme at a post-1992 university in the UK. Building on work that has explored the dialogic dimensions of assessment and feedback, the research explored the potential for more…
Descriptors: Action Research, Feedback (Response), Higher Education, Democracy

House, Ernest R.; Howe, Kenneth R. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Presents a framework for judging evaluations on the basis of their potential for democratic deliberation that includes the interrelated requirements of inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation. Operationalizes these requirements in 10 questions to guide evaluation and meta-evaluation from a democratic viewpoint. (SLD)
Descriptors: Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Meta Analysis, Models

Levin, Henry M. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2002
Describes a comprehensive evaluative framework that draws on a larger range of goals that have been posed for education in a democratic and free society. Tradeoffs are made among criteria that include: (1) freedom of choice; (2) productive efficiency; (3) equity; and (4) social cohesion. (SLD)
Descriptors: Democracy, Educational Vouchers, Equal Education, Evaluation Methods
Mapiasse, Sulaiman – International Education Journal, 2007
This study is intended to examine the influence of the democratic climate of classrooms on student engagement and learning outcomes in order to find out a more adequate model of learning in Civic Education classrooms. A model is developed for testing with data obtained from a sample of 930 students from schools in North Sulawesi. Prior to the…
Descriptors: Citizenship Education, Factor Analysis, Foreign Countries, Democracy
Davies, Lynn – Compare, 1999
Highlights the tensions of defining democracy internationally and the implications for education. Presents an eight-point model to compare systems and schools in transition and analyzes performance indicators for the use of democracy in education. Offers examples of how democracy can be interpreted at different levels in an educational system.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Comparative Education, Democracy, Democratic Values
Schlessman-Frost, Amy – 1991
A democratic model of educational evaluation and some policy recommendations to develop culturally appropriate evaluation are presented. The traditional hard science paradigm in research must be replaced with evaluation designed to feed back to communities of varying cultural backgrounds. The most fundamental assumption of the new model is…
Descriptors: Community Involvement, Cultural Awareness, Democracy, Educational Assessment