NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 33 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maria Hedefalk; Lovisa Sumpter – For the Learning of Mathematics, 2025
We live in an increasingly worrying future, where researchers are looking at how we can create education for a sustainable world. In this study we investigate what such education could look like, especially for young students, reinforcing hope and an ability to act and come up with ideas of sustainable solutions with no obvious 'good' solution.…
Descriptors: Early Childhood Education, Young Children, Ethics, Sustainability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bephyer Parey; Elisabeth Kutscher – Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2024
Rigor evaluation in mixed methods research is a growing need. Linking rigor to Hong and Pluye's (2019) concepts of methodological and reporting quality, the purpose of this article is to operationalize and expand Harrison et al.'s (2020) Rigorous Mixed Methods Framework. Drawing from a systematic methodological review of 66 inclusive education…
Descriptors: Mixed Methods Research, Difficulty Level, Evaluation Methods, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Selçuk Kilinç – Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 2024
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into education has been a game-changer for teaching and assessment practices, bringing new opportunities, but also novel challenges which need to be dealt with. This paper presents the Comprehensive AI Assessment Framework (CAIAF), an evolved version of the AI Assessment Scale…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Evaluation Methods, Ethics, Technology Integration
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Umair Ali Khan; Janne Kauttonen; Lili Aunimo; Ari Alamäki – Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2024
Aim/Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to address the challenges posed by disinformation in an educational context. The paper aims to review existing information assessment techniques, highlight their limitations, and propose a conceptual design for a multimodal, explainable information assessment system for higher education. The ultimate goal…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education, Trust (Psychology), Barriers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Baniasadi, Ali; Salehi, Keyvan; Khodaie, Ebrahim; Bagheri Noaparast, Khosrow; Izanloo, Balal – Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2023
The aim of this study was to identify the components of fair classroom assessment and formulate a conceptual framework for it by following the steps proposed by Okoli and Schabram for a systematic review. For this purpose, three databases including ERIC, Elsevier, and Springer were systematically searched. As a result of this research, 39…
Descriptors: Ethics, Culture Fair Tests, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Picciotto, Robert – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
The adversary evaluation model emerged in a context that favored democratic debate. It was successfully used in a variety of sectors following its inception, but it was abandoned once neo-liberal thinking and goal achievement approaches became dominant. It is time to give it a second chance. The judicial evaluation model (JEM) relies on human…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Democracy, Justice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sternberg, Robert J. – Roeper Review, 2017
Serious identification of the gifted started with the work of Lewis Terman early in the 20th century. Terman's model, based largely on IQ, may have made sense in the early 20th century, but it no longer makes sense today. The problems that society needs its gifted individuals to solve in the 21st century require much more than IQ--in addition to…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Talent Identification, Intelligence Quotient, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
This essay explores the implications of the zeitgeist that emerged in the United States during the 1960s for the conceptualization of ethical issues in evaluation and community psychology, and how perspectives from the latter field might enhance ethical practice in the former. Special attention is paid to articulations of social justice,…
Descriptors: Ethics, Psychology, Social Justice, Standards
Sanetti, Lisa M. H., Ed.; Kratochwill, Thomas R., Ed. – APA Books, 2014
Treatment integrity, in its broadest sense, is the extent to which an intervention is implemented as intended. Over the past 3 decades, understanding of treatment integrity has greatly evolved. This book summarizes the current state of our knowledge of treatment integrity on such topics as: (1) how it fits into the larger contexts of…
Descriptors: Intervention, Program Implementation, Evidence Based Practice, Ethics
Rikoon, Samuel H. – ProQuest LLC, 2013
Beyond the traditional notions of intelligence and academic achievement, the successful development of noncognitive or "soft" skills (e.g., personality factors, motivation, creativity) among school-aged youth represents an important objective for any educational system. Such skills have been shown to be significantly predictive of…
Descriptors: Student Development, Child Development, Skill Development, Personality Traits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Owen, John M. – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2010
This article describes an evaluation that was judged to be unsuccessful from the point of view of key program stakeholders. This was due to the fact that the evaluation did not support program advocates who had much to gain from positive evaluation findings. We argue that, although the knowledge needs of stakeholders must be taken into account,…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Integrity, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Farmer, Richard F.; Goldberg, Lewis R. – Psychological Assessment, 2008
In this reply the authors address comments by C. R. Cloninger (2008) related to their report (R. F. Farmer & L. R. Goldberg, 2008) on the psychometric properties of the revised Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI-R) and a short inventory derivative, the TCI-140. Even though Cloninger's psychobiological model has undergone substantial…
Descriptors: Personality, Psychometrics, Personality Measures, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huotari, Risto – Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 2009
This article focuses on ethical issues faced in evaluation practice from the viewpoint of third generation of activity theory, which gives a constructive perspective on how contradictions can be a driving force behind interorganizational learning and development in multiactor networks. The problem field is firstly addressed through an illustration…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Ethics, Reflection, Organizational Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lundmark, Carina – Environmental Education Research, 2007
The New Environmental or Ecological Paradigm (NEP) is widely acknowledged as a reliable multiple-item scale to capture environmental attitudes or beliefs. It has been used in statistical analyses for almost 30 years, primarily by psychologists, but also by political scientists, sociologists and geographers. The scale's theoretical foundation is,…
Descriptors: Measures (Individuals), Scientists, Psychologists, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Coryn, Chris L. S.; Hattie, John A.; Scriven, Michael; Hartmann, David J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
This research describes, classifies, and comparatively evaluates national models and mechanisms used to evaluate research and allocate research funding in 16 countries. Although these models and mechanisms vary widely in terms of how research is evaluated and financed, nearly all share the common characteristic of relating funding to some measure…
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Resource Allocation
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3