Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 3 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 5 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 5 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Models | 6 |
Reaction Time | 6 |
Reading Tests | 6 |
Accuracy | 3 |
Item Response Theory | 3 |
Reading Comprehension | 3 |
Classification | 2 |
College Students | 2 |
Elementary School Students | 2 |
Error Patterns | 2 |
Foreign Countries | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Annals of Dyslexia | 1 |
Cognitive Psychology | 1 |
Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
Grantee Submission | 1 |
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Author
Amanda Goodwin | 2 |
Jorge Salas | 2 |
Matthew Naveiras | 2 |
Sun-Joo Cho | 2 |
Berlingeri, Manuela | 1 |
Carioti, Desiré | 1 |
Claus H. Carstensen | 1 |
Del Monte, Milena | 1 |
Guasti, Maria Teresa | 1 |
Heyselaar, Evelien | 1 |
Jana Welling | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Germany | 1 |
United Kingdom (Birmingham) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Digit Span Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sun-Joo Cho; Amanda Goodwin; Matthew Naveiras; Jorge Salas – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2024
Despite the growing interest in incorporating response time data into item response models, there has been a lack of research investigating how the effect of speed on the probability of a correct response varies across different groups (e.g., experimental conditions) for various items (i.e., differential response time item analysis). Furthermore,…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Reaction Time, Models, Accuracy
Jana Welling; Timo Gnambs; Claus H. Carstensen – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2024
Disengaged responding poses a severe threat to the validity of educational large-scale assessments, because item responses from unmotivated test-takers do not reflect their actual ability. Existing identification approaches rely primarily on item response times, which bears the risk of misclassifying fast engaged or slow disengaged responses.…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Guessing (Tests), Multiple Choice Tests
Sun-Joo Cho; Amanda Goodwin; Matthew Naveiras; Jorge Salas – Grantee Submission, 2024
Despite the growing interest in incorporating response time data into item response models, there has been a lack of research investigating how the effect of speed on the probability of a correct response varies across different groups (e.g., experimental conditions) for various items (i.e., differential response time item analysis). Furthermore,…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Reaction Time, Models, Accuracy
Carioti, Desiré; Stucchi, Natale Adolfo; Toneatto, Carlo; Masia, Marta Franca; Del Monte, Milena; Stefanelli, Silvia; Travellini, Simona; Marcelli, Antonella; Tettamanti, Marco; Vernice, Mirta; Guasti, Maria Teresa; Berlingeri, Manuela – Annals of Dyslexia, 2023
In this study, we validated the "ReadFree tool", a computerised battery of 12 visual and auditory tasks developed to identify poor readers also in minority-language children (MLC). We tested the task-specific discriminant power on 142 Italian-monolingual participants (8-13 years old) divided into monolingual poor readers (N = 37) and…
Descriptors: Language Minorities, Task Analysis, Italian, Monolingualism
Heyselaar, Evelien; Wheeldon, Linda; Segaert, Katrien – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2021
Structural priming is the tendency to repeat syntactic structure across sentences and can be divided into short-term (prime to immediately following target) and long-term (across an experimental session) components. This study investigates how nondeclarative memory could support both the transient, short-term and the persistent, long-term…
Descriptors: Priming, Memory, Short Term Memory, Perception

Rips, Lance J. – Cognitive Psychology, 1975
Two models are considered for how people verify explicitly quantified sentences. To test the models, three reaction time experiments required subjects to verify statements quantified by some or all. The results show that some-statements took longer to verify than all-statements. (Author/DEP)
Descriptors: Classification, College Students, Memory, Models