Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 3 |
Evaluators | 3 |
Models | 3 |
Resource Allocation | 3 |
Program Evaluation | 2 |
Accountability | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
Credibility | 1 |
Educational Environment | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Boyd, Heather H. | 1 |
Coryn, Chris L. S. | 1 |
Hartmann, David J. | 1 |
Hattie, John A. | 1 |
Novak, Carl D. | 1 |
Scriven, Michael | 1 |
Taylor-Powell, Ellen | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Coryn, Chris L. S.; Hattie, John A.; Scriven, Michael; Hartmann, David J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
This research describes, classifies, and comparatively evaluates national models and mechanisms used to evaluate research and allocate research funding in 16 countries. Although these models and mechanisms vary widely in terms of how research is evaluated and financed, nearly all share the common characteristic of relating funding to some measure…
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Comparative Analysis, Resource Allocation
Taylor-Powell, Ellen; Boyd, Heather H. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2008
Evaluation capacity building, or ECB, is an area of great interest within the field of evaluation as well as in Extension evaluation. Internal Extension evaluators have long offered training and technical assistance to help Extension educators conduct evaluation. Today ECB in Extension encompasses myriad activities and processes to advance…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Models, Organizational Change, Logical Thinking
Novak, Carl D. – 1985
The evaluation team of the Lincoln Public Schools (Nebraska) used the multi-attribution utility technology (MAUT) approach to prioritize potential evaluation projects. The priorities were used to allocate resources to the district's most important projects, and to eliminate or scale down less important projects. The problem was caused initially…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs