Descriptor
| Models | 3 |
| Standardized Tests | 3 |
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Norms | 2 |
| Sampling | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Compensatory Education | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBrandenburg, Dale C.; Forsyth, Robert A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Goodness of Fit, Item Sampling, Models
Download full textBrandenburg, Dale C.; Forsyth, Robert A. – 1973
Multiple matrix sampling (MMS) procedures were utilized to determine the necessary parameters of a Pearson Type I curve. Empirical norms distributions were approximated by both the Type I model and the negative hypergeometric model. Four existing ITED norms distributions, two subtests and two grades, were approximated by the MMS procedures. Two…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Matrices, Models, National Norms
Linn, Robert L. – 1978
The three RMC models endorsed by the U.S. Office of Education for the evaluation of Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I programs are based on narrowly conceived approaches to evaluation--the measurement of cognitive achievement gains. Each model requires the comparison of observed student performance with an estimate of what level of…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Control Groups
