Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Data Collection | 11 |
Models | 11 |
State Government | 11 |
Academic Standards | 9 |
Educational Change | 9 |
Higher Education | 9 |
Best Practices | 8 |
Budgets | 8 |
Language Arts | 8 |
Program Evaluation | 8 |
Program Implementation | 8 |
More ▼ |
Author
Green, Kenneth C. | 1 |
Harris, Edward | 1 |
Murphy, Patrick | 1 |
Regenstein, Elliot | 1 |
Rutherford, Jean | 1 |
Zumeta, William | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 8 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 6 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Audience
Community | 1 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Location
California | 2 |
Illinois | 2 |
Massachusetts | 2 |
New York | 2 |
Texas | 2 |
Florida | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
Ohio | 1 |
Rhode Island | 1 |
Tennessee | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
American Recovery and… | 7 |
Race to the Top | 7 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Murphy, Patrick; Regenstein, Elliot – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2012
The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for English language arts and mathematics represent a sea change in standards-based reform and their implementation is the movement's next--and greatest--challenge. Yet, while most states have now set forth implementation plans, these tomes seldom address the crucial matter of cost. Putting a Price Tag on the…
Descriptors: Expenditures, State Standards, Costs, Academic Standards
US Department of Education, 2012
The Department has developed a Race to the Top program review process that not only addresses the Department's responsibilities for fiscal and programmatic oversight, but is designed to identify areas to differentiate support based on individual State needs, as well as certain topics where States can leverage work with each other and with experts…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
US Department of Education, 2012
The State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Massachusetts' Year 1 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation to date. Massachusetts' Year 1 accomplishments include: capacity building within its Department of Elementary and…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
US Department of Education, 2012
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of North Carolina's Year 1 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation to date. Delaware created new structures at the State level to support both State and LEA (local education…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
US Department of Education, 2012
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Ohio's Year 1 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation to date. Prior to the first year of its Race to the Top grant, Ohio revised some Ohio Department of Education (ODE) job…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
US Department of Education, 2012
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of New York's Year 1 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation to date. New York significantly increased its capacity to provide support to its local educational agencies (LEAs). At…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
Race to the Top. Rhode Island Report. Year 1: School Year 2010-2011. [State-Specific Summary Report]
US Department of Education, 2012
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Rhode Island's Year 1 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation to date. According to the State, in Year 1, Rhode Island greatly increased statewide capacity to begin…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
US Department of Education, 2012
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Tennessee's Year 1 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation to date. Tennessee received its Race to the Top grant in July 2010 as part of the first round of the competition.…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
Rutherford, Jean – National Center for Educational Accountability, 2006
Governors and state and local education officials assumed that raising student achievement in the elementary and middle grades would solve the problems with high schools--but it hasn't. Why? Good information is the basis for successful improvement, and high school reform lacks accurate information about what students are to learn and about how…
Descriptors: High Schools, Educational Quality, School Effectiveness, Best Practices
Zumeta, William; Green, Kenneth C. – 1987
Results of a study concerning the relationships between state policies and private college enrollments, enrollment demographics, and finance are presented. After considering national enrollment trends in the independent sector, attention is directed to the impacts on private colleges of state fiscal policies, including aid to private colleges and…
Descriptors: Access to Education, College Planning, Data Collection, Enrollment Trends
Harris, Edward – 1984
An economic development model was formulated to foster and strengthen commerce and industry retention and expansion in the state of Illinois. The main thrust of the model was on increasing productivity, decreasing business failures, encouraging entrepreneurship, and creating a favorable business climate through community support. To meet these…
Descriptors: Business, Community Colleges, Community Support, Cooperative Planning