Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 11 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 65 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 206 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 577 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Baker, Ryan S. | 6 |
| Ysseldyke, James E. | 5 |
| Aleven, Vincent | 3 |
| Barnes, Tiffany | 3 |
| Cannon, Jill S. | 3 |
| Dillenbourg, Pierre | 3 |
| Gobert, Janice D. | 3 |
| Gomez, Celia J. | 3 |
| Heffernan, Neil | 3 |
| Horst, Donald P. | 3 |
| Karoly, Lynn A. | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 64 |
| Researchers | 29 |
| Administrators | 27 |
| Policymakers | 19 |
| Teachers | 19 |
| Community | 6 |
| Students | 3 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Parents | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 30 |
| Australia | 26 |
| Canada | 22 |
| United States | 21 |
| United Kingdom | 16 |
| Florida | 14 |
| Massachusetts | 14 |
| Pennsylvania | 14 |
| Michigan | 13 |
| Washington | 13 |
| Illinois | 12 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 2 |
Horwitz, Jonathan; Kimpel, Howard – Training and Development Journal, 1988
Whenever there is a data gathering need and a group of people have input, the group interview may be a viable approach. The authors offer a step-by-step model for conducting group interviews. (JOW)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Group Discussion, Group Dynamics, Interviews
Peer reviewedHathaway, W. E. – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1976
An educational feasibility framework is described which considers constraints to feasibility, sources of data for determining feasibility, and feasibility study methodology. (Author)
Descriptors: Criteria, Data Collection, Educational Research, Feasibility Studies
Gill, Barbara J.; And Others – Educational Technology, 1992
Describes the evaluation of a new model for software evaluation that emphasizes the collection of student performance data to determine the extent to which students learn the knowledge a software package intends to teach. Discussion covers the results of two studies, evaluation criteria and methods, evaluator subjectivity in decision making,…
Descriptors: Computer Software Evaluation, Data Collection, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria
Kaufman, Roger – Performance and Instruction, 1990
Discusses strategic planning and describes three levels of strategic planning and thinking that can occur within an organization. Differences between reactive and proactive planning are explained, and a strategic planning model is presented that includes data collecting, planning, and implementation and evaluation. (10 references) (LRW)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Models
Peer reviewedHarwell, Michael – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1999
Suggests two complementary frameworks for providing validity evidence for rating data. One conceptualizes raters as data collection instruments that should be subject to traditional procedures for establishing validity evidence; the other evaluates studies using raters from an experimental design perspective allowing the assessment of the study's…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Data Collection, Educational Research, Models
Peer reviewedEarly, Reed; Bowmar, Barbara; Homer, Garth – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2000
Reviews the literature and outlines a framework for performance measurement and evaluation within post-secondary continuing education. In the framework, performance measurement serves as ongoing data collection and decision support, placing outputs, outcomes, and ratios as performance indicators in a matrix. (SLD)
Descriptors: Continuing Education, Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Models
Peer reviewedKelsey, Kathleen Dodge; Pense, Seburn L. – Journal of Agricultural Education, 2001
A model for collecting and using stakeholder input on research priorities is a modification of Guba and Lincoln's model, involving preevaluation preparation, stakeholder identification, information gathering and analysis, interpretive filtering, and negotiation and consensus. A case study at Oklahoma State University illustrates its applicability…
Descriptors: Accountability, Data Collection, Higher Education, Land Grant Universities
Cuthbert, Peter F. – Teaching in Higher Education, 2005
The Learning Styles school and the Approaches to Learning school represent two rather different perspectives on the interaction of students with a learning situation. This paper outlines the basic positions of the two schools, and then considers the extent to which it is possible to reconcile them. A possible framework for such a task by Riding (…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Cognitive Style, Learning Processes, Data Collection
Rossi, Tony; Fry, Joan M.; McNeill, Mike; Tan, Clara W. K. – Sport, Education and Society, 2007
This paper reports on the views of Singaporean teachers of a mandated curriculum innovation aimed at changing the nature of games pedagogy within the physical education curriculum framework in Singapore. Since its first appearance over 20 years ago, Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU), as an approach to games pedagogy has gathered support…
Descriptors: Physical Education, Innovation, Foreign Countries, Teaching Methods
Farrell, Glen M. – Commonwealth of Learning, 2009
Results-based management (RBM) is an approach to programme planning and management that integrates strategy, people, resources, processes and measurements to improve decision-making, transparency and accountability. The Commonwealth of Learning (COL) began the adoption of a RBM model with its 2003-2006 Three-Year Plan. This led to a significantly…
Descriptors: Models, Partnerships in Education, Strategic Planning, Guides
US Department of Education, 2012
The Department has developed a Race to the Top program review process that not only addresses the Department's responsibilities for fiscal and programmatic oversight, but is designed to identify areas to differentiate support based on individual State needs, as well as certain topics where States can leverage work with each other and with experts…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
US Department of Education, 2012
The State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Massachusetts' Year 1 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation to date. Massachusetts' Year 1 accomplishments include: capacity building within its Department of Elementary and…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
US Department of Education, 2012
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of North Carolina's Year 1 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation to date. Delaware created new structures at the State level to support both State and LEA (local education…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
US Department of Education, 2012
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Ohio's Year 1 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation to date. Prior to the first year of its Race to the Top grant, Ohio revised some Ohio Department of Education (ODE) job…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains
US Department of Education, 2012
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of New York's Year 1 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation to date. New York significantly increased its capacity to provide support to its local educational agencies (LEAs). At…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gains

Direct link
